The Crypto market has entered a fundamentally different chapter. While 2024 saw the catastrophic liquidation of the first cycle’s speculation bubble—with $40 billion wiped out and the industry’s speculative consensus destroyed—2025 marked something far more significant: the end of the last Kondratiev wave cycle in traditional finance itself. What emerges now is not another market rebound, but the structural birth of what we call DeFi 2.0.
The Data Tells a Clearer Story Than Hype
Here’s what actually happened by late 2025: stablecoins reached a $305 billion supply with $47.6 trillion in transaction volume. Compare that to global M0 supply of $15 trillion and $1,500 trillion in traditional currency flows. The math is stark: stablecoins represent just 2.0% of money supply yet account for 3.2% of all transactions. That 60% activity premium over traditional money reveals the real shift—it’s not about hype anymore, it’s about utility.
This wasn’t accident. Four consecutive years of 65% annualized compound growth in stablecoin adoption means we’re watching the fastest financial infrastructure migration in history. Coinbase’s market outlook for 2026 documents this transition with precision that cuts through the noise most analysts still cling to.
Traditional Finance Hits Its Own Wall
Meanwhile, central banks globally face what they won’t publicly admit: the playbook is exhausted. From February 2020 to April 2022, the U.S. printed M2 money supply increases of 40%. No amount of 25bp or 100bp rate adjustments changes that arithmetic—it only changes perception. We’ve shifted from economic policy to emotional management.
This explains the quiet reshuffling in Q3-Q4 2025. Nasdaq suddenly proposed 24/7 trading. Robinhood and Coinbase began building native RWA tokenization systems. Institutional players recognized what many still deny: the traditional financial cartel’s moat is crumbling not because of regulation, but because the infrastructure underneath no longer works for a digitized world.
The contradiction is simple: traditional management systems optimized for analog-era constraints now strangle digital-era productivity. Call it what economists have termed “Data Medieval”—excessive regulatory rigidity makes every historical path both unbreakable and exponentially more costly. The result: smart players are exiting the old paradigm, not refinancing it.
Where Real Growth Is Actually Happening
This is where the story gets genuinely interesting. While developed economies remained paralyzed by regulatory theology, emerging markets exploded. Nigeria, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and dozens of African, South American, and Southeast Asian nations didn’t ask permission—they just adopted stablecoins and Crypto Finance at exponential rates.
The feedback from cross-border payment companies in 2025 was unanimous: “What they want is stablecoins. Or platform tokens. Either way, they’re moving forward.”
The data gap is massive: these regions are operating what accountants call “off-balance-sheet assets,” completely bypassing the traditional financial gatekeepers. Some emerging economies already show stablecoin usage surpassing local fiat currency volumes. The analytical data of mainstream global economics is no longer accurate—it’s measuring a world that’s being quietly left behind.
Within five years, this won’t be fringe anymore. Global economic power distribution will reshape around where the actual financial infrastructure actually works.
The Kondratiev Cycle and Why Historical Patterns Matter
To understand 2026, we need to understand 1910-1935. When Standard Oil got broken into 34 companies in 1911, oil’s role in automobiles and aviation was already crystal clear. The breakup didn’t prevent 30 years of chaos. Why? Because monopolistic production relations of the previous cycle couldn’t adapt to new productivity. That structural failure manifested as systemic disorder—not because innovation was missing, but because power structures couldn’t adjust.
We’re seeing the same pattern compressed into a faster timeline. AI’s development is inevitable. Crypto’s infrastructure is inevitable. But the semi-feudal, semi-monopolistic capitalism framework attempting to manage both is reaching its limit. Policy tools can delay, but they cannot prevent entropy increase.
The Kondratiev wave cycle doesn’t end cleanly—it ends in reorganization.
DeFi 2.0 Isn’t a Rebrand—It’s a Rebuild
Three concepts define 2026’s market:
DeFi 2.0 itself pivots from speculation to infrastructure: Onchain Asset Management, RWA Finance, and Tokenization. Every major player—CEXs, Layer 1s, core infrastructure—is migrating toward PayFi and RWA integration.
DAT 2.0 (Digital Asset Transfer) learned from 2025’s DAT 1.0 failure. The first iteration simply transferred speculation from Crypto’s first cycle into traditional stock-market language. It collapsed because the friction was too real and the story too simple. DAT 2.0 flips this: instead of traditional finance trying to speculate on Crypto holdings, it integrates real Crypto-second-cycle value directly. Ondo, Ethena, Maple, and emerging builders already proved the model works.
Tokenomics 2.0 represents financial engineering graduation. It’s not just token issuance mechanics anymore—it’s Financial Circuit design, where each tokenomic scenario continuously optimizes like a financial circuit correcting for real-world conditions. Protocols like Pendle demonstrate what universal frameworks look like once consensus forms around implementation.
The throughline: all three represent the shift from speculation-driven narratives to utility-driven infrastructure.
What Actually Matters for 2026
The key question isn’t whether chaos comes—structural entropy increases are irreversible. The question is whether Crypto and Open Finance can bridge the adoption chasm fast enough to reshape global economic flows before traditional institutions complete their transition.
The numbers suggest yes. If emerging economies continue adoption at current rates while developed markets finally admit their infrastructure needs rebuilding, the nonlinear acceleration becomes the defining feature of 2026.
This isn’t about price predictions or short-term trading. It’s about watching the infrastructure that moves money on a planet finally getting an upgrade after decades of patch work—and the chaos that upgrade creates is actually where real opportunity lives.
The first Kondratiev cycle of Crypto ended in 2024. The last Kondratiev cycle of traditional finance ended in 2025. What begins in 2026 runs on different rules entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
DeFi 2.0 Takes Center Stage: How Chaos Creates Opportunity in 2026
The Crypto market has entered a fundamentally different chapter. While 2024 saw the catastrophic liquidation of the first cycle’s speculation bubble—with $40 billion wiped out and the industry’s speculative consensus destroyed—2025 marked something far more significant: the end of the last Kondratiev wave cycle in traditional finance itself. What emerges now is not another market rebound, but the structural birth of what we call DeFi 2.0.
The Data Tells a Clearer Story Than Hype
Here’s what actually happened by late 2025: stablecoins reached a $305 billion supply with $47.6 trillion in transaction volume. Compare that to global M0 supply of $15 trillion and $1,500 trillion in traditional currency flows. The math is stark: stablecoins represent just 2.0% of money supply yet account for 3.2% of all transactions. That 60% activity premium over traditional money reveals the real shift—it’s not about hype anymore, it’s about utility.
This wasn’t accident. Four consecutive years of 65% annualized compound growth in stablecoin adoption means we’re watching the fastest financial infrastructure migration in history. Coinbase’s market outlook for 2026 documents this transition with precision that cuts through the noise most analysts still cling to.
Traditional Finance Hits Its Own Wall
Meanwhile, central banks globally face what they won’t publicly admit: the playbook is exhausted. From February 2020 to April 2022, the U.S. printed M2 money supply increases of 40%. No amount of 25bp or 100bp rate adjustments changes that arithmetic—it only changes perception. We’ve shifted from economic policy to emotional management.
This explains the quiet reshuffling in Q3-Q4 2025. Nasdaq suddenly proposed 24/7 trading. Robinhood and Coinbase began building native RWA tokenization systems. Institutional players recognized what many still deny: the traditional financial cartel’s moat is crumbling not because of regulation, but because the infrastructure underneath no longer works for a digitized world.
The contradiction is simple: traditional management systems optimized for analog-era constraints now strangle digital-era productivity. Call it what economists have termed “Data Medieval”—excessive regulatory rigidity makes every historical path both unbreakable and exponentially more costly. The result: smart players are exiting the old paradigm, not refinancing it.
Where Real Growth Is Actually Happening
This is where the story gets genuinely interesting. While developed economies remained paralyzed by regulatory theology, emerging markets exploded. Nigeria, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and dozens of African, South American, and Southeast Asian nations didn’t ask permission—they just adopted stablecoins and Crypto Finance at exponential rates.
The feedback from cross-border payment companies in 2025 was unanimous: “What they want is stablecoins. Or platform tokens. Either way, they’re moving forward.”
The data gap is massive: these regions are operating what accountants call “off-balance-sheet assets,” completely bypassing the traditional financial gatekeepers. Some emerging economies already show stablecoin usage surpassing local fiat currency volumes. The analytical data of mainstream global economics is no longer accurate—it’s measuring a world that’s being quietly left behind.
Within five years, this won’t be fringe anymore. Global economic power distribution will reshape around where the actual financial infrastructure actually works.
The Kondratiev Cycle and Why Historical Patterns Matter
To understand 2026, we need to understand 1910-1935. When Standard Oil got broken into 34 companies in 1911, oil’s role in automobiles and aviation was already crystal clear. The breakup didn’t prevent 30 years of chaos. Why? Because monopolistic production relations of the previous cycle couldn’t adapt to new productivity. That structural failure manifested as systemic disorder—not because innovation was missing, but because power structures couldn’t adjust.
We’re seeing the same pattern compressed into a faster timeline. AI’s development is inevitable. Crypto’s infrastructure is inevitable. But the semi-feudal, semi-monopolistic capitalism framework attempting to manage both is reaching its limit. Policy tools can delay, but they cannot prevent entropy increase.
The Kondratiev wave cycle doesn’t end cleanly—it ends in reorganization.
DeFi 2.0 Isn’t a Rebrand—It’s a Rebuild
Three concepts define 2026’s market:
DeFi 2.0 itself pivots from speculation to infrastructure: Onchain Asset Management, RWA Finance, and Tokenization. Every major player—CEXs, Layer 1s, core infrastructure—is migrating toward PayFi and RWA integration.
DAT 2.0 (Digital Asset Transfer) learned from 2025’s DAT 1.0 failure. The first iteration simply transferred speculation from Crypto’s first cycle into traditional stock-market language. It collapsed because the friction was too real and the story too simple. DAT 2.0 flips this: instead of traditional finance trying to speculate on Crypto holdings, it integrates real Crypto-second-cycle value directly. Ondo, Ethena, Maple, and emerging builders already proved the model works.
Tokenomics 2.0 represents financial engineering graduation. It’s not just token issuance mechanics anymore—it’s Financial Circuit design, where each tokenomic scenario continuously optimizes like a financial circuit correcting for real-world conditions. Protocols like Pendle demonstrate what universal frameworks look like once consensus forms around implementation.
The throughline: all three represent the shift from speculation-driven narratives to utility-driven infrastructure.
What Actually Matters for 2026
The key question isn’t whether chaos comes—structural entropy increases are irreversible. The question is whether Crypto and Open Finance can bridge the adoption chasm fast enough to reshape global economic flows before traditional institutions complete their transition.
The numbers suggest yes. If emerging economies continue adoption at current rates while developed markets finally admit their infrastructure needs rebuilding, the nonlinear acceleration becomes the defining feature of 2026.
This isn’t about price predictions or short-term trading. It’s about watching the infrastructure that moves money on a planet finally getting an upgrade after decades of patch work—and the chaos that upgrade creates is actually where real opportunity lives.
The first Kondratiev cycle of Crypto ended in 2024. The last Kondratiev cycle of traditional finance ended in 2025. What begins in 2026 runs on different rules entirely.