2026-01-19 05:36:21

Ever notice how we keep redefining what counts as 'artificial intelligence'? When AI mastered chess, we called it 'just brute force calculation.' Go fell next—suddenly that was 'mere pattern matching.' AI writes well? Obviously 'fancy autocomplete.' Then coding came along, and everyone said 'sure, but it can't do EVERYTHING, right?'

Here's the thing nobody wants to admit: the goalposts for AGI keep moving. Every time AI crosses a threshold we thought was uniquely human, we quietly shift the definition. What we're really doing is defining AGI as 'whatever AI hasn't conquered yet'—a perpetually receding horizon rather than an actual milestone.

It's less about genuine capability assessment and more about how uncomfortable we get when machines keep proving us wrong.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenDustCollector

· 9h ago

Basically, it's just our own mindset problem—can't accept losing. --- Every time AI breaks a record, we change the rules. We've been playing this game for so many years, isn't it tiring? --- Really, the goalposts keep moving, it feels like we're just trying to find a sense of security. --- Haha, "It can write code but can't write poetry"... When AI actually does write poetry, then it'll be "That's not real poetry," and the cycle continues. --- The core issue is that we don't want to admit that machines will surpass humans, but it's inevitable sooner or later. --- So, AGI is actually a constantly retreating threshold, never-ending. --- Humans' psychological defenses keep collapsing one after another, and it's quite a comedy.

View OriginalReply0

OPsychology

· 9h ago

Humans just love to deny, anyway, if AI can't do it, we just keep pretending it's "true intelligence," until there's nothing left to pretend.

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 9h ago

To be honest, we're just playing word games with ourselves.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerGas

· 9h ago

It's just the standard sliding door pillar. Every time AI clears a level, we change the rules. This logic is as familiar as some project teams changing tokenomics... Ultimately, it's still a psychological defense mechanism.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 9h ago

Honestly, this is just collective self-deception, haha.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 9h ago

Nah, this is the common flaw of humanity, increasingly dismissing oneself.

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 9h ago

A typical humanized defense mechanism: every time they get slapped in the face, they change the rules. This logic is the same as chasing highs and selling lows like a rookie—when losing money, they say "the technicals haven't confirmed yet." Clinging to patterns that have already formed is truly interesting.

View OriginalReply0