The internet landscape is shifting. Today’s web—dominated by major technology corporations—faces a credibility crisis. Research shows that roughly 75% of Americans believe big tech companies like Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon wield excessive control over the internet, and 85% suspect at least one of these firms monitors their activities. These concerns have sparked a movement toward an alternative internet model known as Web3, which promises to return power to users through decentralized architecture. But to understand this web3 revolution, we need to examine how we got here.
Three Eras of the Internet: Web1, Web2, and Web3
The internet hasn’t always looked like this. It has evolved through distinct phases, each reshaping how people interact online.
The Origins: Web1 and the “Read-Only” Internet
In 1989, British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee invented the first version of the World Wide Web at CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) to facilitate information sharing between research institutions. Throughout the 1990s, as servers multiplied and accessibility expanded beyond laboratories, Web1 emerged as the internet’s initial form.
This early internet consisted of static pages—think Wikipedia-style content with hyperlinks—where visitors could only consume information. There was no commenting, no uploading videos, no user interaction. It was purely a “read-only” experience, a digital library rather than a community.
The Interactive Boom: Web2’s “Read-and-Write” Model
Around the mid-2000s, everything changed. New technologies enabled web2 platforms to become interactive spaces where users didn’t just read—they created. YouTube let people upload videos, Reddit enabled community discussions, Amazon allowed shoppers to leave reviews, and Facebook connected billions in social networks.
This shift from passive consumption to active participation defined Web2. Users became content creators, bloggers, and community members. However, there was a catch: big tech companies own everything users create. Google and Meta monetize this user-generated content through advertising, capturing roughly 80-90% of their annual revenue from online ads alone. Users create value; corporations extract profit.
The Decentralized Alternative: Web3’s “Read-Write-Own” Vision
The genesis of Web3 traces back to 2009 when an anonymous developer using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin, introducing blockchain technology—a decentralized ledger system that records transactions without requiring a central authority or bank.
Bitcoin’s peer-to-peer architecture inspired technologists to reimagine the web itself. If money could be decentralized, why not the entire internet? In 2015, Vitalik Buterin and his team launched Ethereum, adding smart contracts—self-executing code that automates transactions and eliminates the need for intermediaries. These innovations enabled decentralized applications (dApps) that function like web2 apps but operate on blockchain networks instead of corporate servers.
Computer scientist Gavin Wood, founder of Polkadot, formally introduced the term “Web3” to describe this shift toward user-owned, decentralized digital infrastructure.
Web2 vs. Web3: The Architectural Difference
The fundamental distinction lies in architecture and control:
Web2 operates on centralized servers owned by corporations. This creates efficiency but concentrates power. A handful of companies control user data, decide what content appears, and set the rules.
Web3 runs on distributed blockchain networks with thousands of nodes. No single entity controls the system. Users access services through crypto wallets—think digital keys—that work across multiple platforms without surrendering personal information.
Additionally, many web3 platforms employ decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), governance structures where token holders vote on decisions. Compare this to web2, where corporate executives and shareholders make unilateral choices.
The Trade-offs: Strengths and Weaknesses
Web2’s Advantages
Rapid deployment and scaling: Centralized decision-making allows quick updates and expansion
User-friendly interfaces: Intuitive design makes web2 services accessible to non-technical users
Fast processing: Centralized servers deliver quick transactions and data dispute resolution
Web2’s Critical Flaws
Privacy nightmare: Over 50% of internet traffic routes through just a few tech giants, creating massive surveillance infrastructure. Users have little control over how their data is harvested, analyzed, or sold
Single point of failure: One security breach or server outage cascades across millions of users. When Amazon’s AWS experienced downtime in 2020 and 2021, services like The Washington Post, Coinbase, and Disney+ went offline simultaneously
No true ownership: While users create content, corporations retain control and take revenue cuts
Web3’s Advantages
User ownership and privacy: Blockchain transparency means users control their digital assets and identities. No intermediaries can censor or monetize content without permission
Resilient infrastructure: With no central server, thousands of nodes ensure the network survives individual failures
Democratic governance: Token-holding community members vote on protocol changes, not boardroom executives
Web3’s Limitations
Steep learning curve: Users must understand crypto wallets, digital asset transfers, and blockchain mechanics—significantly more complex than clicking a login button
Transaction costs: Unlike free web2 services, blockchain interactions require “gas fees” (though some networks like Solana or Ethereum’s Layer-2 solutions cost only pennies)
Slower scaling: DAOs prioritize decentralization over speed; community voting on proposals delays rapid iteration and scaling
Still experimental: Web3 infrastructure is young, tools are less polished, and user interfaces lag behind web2’s sophistication
Getting Started with Web3
Ready to explore? Here’s how:
Download a blockchain-compatible wallet: Choose based on your preferred blockchain—MetaMask or Coinbase Wallet for Ethereum, Phantom for Solana
Fund your wallet with cryptocurrency
Connect to dApps: Visit platforms like dAppRadar or DeFiLlama to browse available applications across categories (gaming, NFTs, DeFi)
Click “Connect Wallet” on any dApp’s homepage to begin using web3 services
The web is fragmenting into two models: web2’s convenient but surveillance-heavy ecosystem, and web3’s decentralized but less intuitive alternative. As blockchain technology matures and user experience improves, the competition between these visions will reshape internet governance for years to come.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Evolution from Web2 to Web3: Why the Internet Is Changing
The internet landscape is shifting. Today’s web—dominated by major technology corporations—faces a credibility crisis. Research shows that roughly 75% of Americans believe big tech companies like Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon wield excessive control over the internet, and 85% suspect at least one of these firms monitors their activities. These concerns have sparked a movement toward an alternative internet model known as Web3, which promises to return power to users through decentralized architecture. But to understand this web3 revolution, we need to examine how we got here.
Three Eras of the Internet: Web1, Web2, and Web3
The internet hasn’t always looked like this. It has evolved through distinct phases, each reshaping how people interact online.
The Origins: Web1 and the “Read-Only” Internet
In 1989, British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee invented the first version of the World Wide Web at CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) to facilitate information sharing between research institutions. Throughout the 1990s, as servers multiplied and accessibility expanded beyond laboratories, Web1 emerged as the internet’s initial form.
This early internet consisted of static pages—think Wikipedia-style content with hyperlinks—where visitors could only consume information. There was no commenting, no uploading videos, no user interaction. It was purely a “read-only” experience, a digital library rather than a community.
The Interactive Boom: Web2’s “Read-and-Write” Model
Around the mid-2000s, everything changed. New technologies enabled web2 platforms to become interactive spaces where users didn’t just read—they created. YouTube let people upload videos, Reddit enabled community discussions, Amazon allowed shoppers to leave reviews, and Facebook connected billions in social networks.
This shift from passive consumption to active participation defined Web2. Users became content creators, bloggers, and community members. However, there was a catch: big tech companies own everything users create. Google and Meta monetize this user-generated content through advertising, capturing roughly 80-90% of their annual revenue from online ads alone. Users create value; corporations extract profit.
The Decentralized Alternative: Web3’s “Read-Write-Own” Vision
The genesis of Web3 traces back to 2009 when an anonymous developer using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin, introducing blockchain technology—a decentralized ledger system that records transactions without requiring a central authority or bank.
Bitcoin’s peer-to-peer architecture inspired technologists to reimagine the web itself. If money could be decentralized, why not the entire internet? In 2015, Vitalik Buterin and his team launched Ethereum, adding smart contracts—self-executing code that automates transactions and eliminates the need for intermediaries. These innovations enabled decentralized applications (dApps) that function like web2 apps but operate on blockchain networks instead of corporate servers.
Computer scientist Gavin Wood, founder of Polkadot, formally introduced the term “Web3” to describe this shift toward user-owned, decentralized digital infrastructure.
Web2 vs. Web3: The Architectural Difference
The fundamental distinction lies in architecture and control:
Web2 operates on centralized servers owned by corporations. This creates efficiency but concentrates power. A handful of companies control user data, decide what content appears, and set the rules.
Web3 runs on distributed blockchain networks with thousands of nodes. No single entity controls the system. Users access services through crypto wallets—think digital keys—that work across multiple platforms without surrendering personal information.
Additionally, many web3 platforms employ decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), governance structures where token holders vote on decisions. Compare this to web2, where corporate executives and shareholders make unilateral choices.
The Trade-offs: Strengths and Weaknesses
Web2’s Advantages
Web2’s Critical Flaws
Web3’s Advantages
Web3’s Limitations
Getting Started with Web3
Ready to explore? Here’s how:
The web is fragmenting into two models: web2’s convenient but surveillance-heavy ecosystem, and web3’s decentralized but less intuitive alternative. As blockchain technology matures and user experience improves, the competition between these visions will reshape internet governance for years to come.