2026-01-07 02:29:36

If a top-tier trader with massive trading volume on Hyperliquid were to switch over and start actively using another platform, would that kind of influence actually sway listing decisions? Wondering how much weight these high-volume players really carry when it comes to which tokens get exposure on a growing exchange. 👀

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropATM

· 22h ago

This is a joke. Exchanges don't care where you go. Do you really think you're the big boss?

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 01-09 09:29

ngl This is the reality. When big players make a move, exchanges tremble, liquidity is the real boss.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 01-07 02:55

NGL, the big whales running away has been an insider secret for a long time. Who really believes that exchanges list tokens based on fairness?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 01-07 02:43

NGL, it sounds like the old trick of big players holding the power. Can the whales at Hyperliquid really decide the listing? I think it's a stretch.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 01-07 02:33

Nah, these big players really have a say, but don't overestimate it... Exchanges ultimately look at data and profits, not the mood of any individual.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-7b078580

· 01-07 02:30

Data shows that this logic is fundamentally flawed... Large-scale migration ≠ increased listing weight, as exchanges have long locked the algorithm. Although, the real influence still lies with miners and market makers, as can be seen during historical lows.

View OriginalReply0