#数字资产动态追踪 $ETH $DOGE $PEPE

Recently, new gameplay has emerged in airdrop rules—the decreasing points mechanism of BREV is quite interesting. Starting from 30 points, it drops by 5 points every minute, stopping at 10 points. As soon as this dynamic pricing method was introduced, the project's opening market immediately became volatile, and market reactions were quite sensitive.

In simple terms, the increasingly refined rules reflect whether project teams are trying to build a stronger community or just finding new ways to cut leeks. This is a question worth pondering. Looking at projects that have already built solid consensus and can attract people without relying on airdrops, they seem to demonstrate a different kind of vitality—participating purely because of confidence, not driven by incentive mechanisms.

There are some examples within the Ethereum ecosystem, like $PUPPIES, which has maintained popularity. The driving force behind such projects is more about genuine interest rather than a promise of airdrops. When airdrop tactics become diverse, these "self-motivated without incentives" projects form an interesting contrast. What do you think about these kinds of dynamic rules?