#比特币与代币化黄金的对比 ⚡How Will the Gold Revaluation Storm Rewrite the Cryptocurrency Landscape?
Recently, a core message has been circulating in the financial circles: the US may revalue the book value of its gold reserves. What signals are hidden behind this seemingly ordinary accounting move?
**How absurd is the current situation comparison?**
▸Book value: $42 per ounce (locked in the 1940s) ▸Current market price: $4,400 per ounce ▸Potential asset release: over $1 trillion
This is not just a numbers game. When a country's balance sheet shows such a huge gap, what does it reflect? What does it mean for the financial system?
**Chain reactions at three levels**
First, liquidity. If this step is truly executed, it would artificially add assets supporting trillions of dollars. Historically, large-scale asset revaluations like this are usually accompanied by significant liquidity expansion—this can push up commodity prices, asset prices, and even trigger a new inflation cycle.
Second, monetary trust. When the largest reserve currency issuing country begins to reprice its gold assets, it sends a signal to global central banks: the importance of hard assets is rising. Once this expectation forms, the asset allocation logic of central banks may accelerate adjustments, and demand for US Treasuries could be pressured.
Third, asset flow. When gold breaks through key price levels, historical data shows that some traditional wealth flows into risk assets, especially emerging asset classes. This pattern has been repeatedly validated in crypto market cycles.
**Market preview direction**
If gold reaches the $5,000 level:
• The theoretical target range for Bitcoin valuation could be $180,000–$220,000 • Silver and mining stocks are expected to enter a Davis double play • Liquidity-rich crypto assets like SOL, ETH will become the main recipients of spillover funds
(Referencing history: during the last similar easing cycle, mainstream crypto assets experienced an 18-fold increase)
**Core reflection**
All of this boils down to a simple logic: when fiat systems begin to actively acknowledge the value of hard assets, what does it indicate? It indicates that confidence in the value of money itself is retreating. In this big context, what assets are most attractive? Those that are inherently scarce and difficult to inflate.
Gold is like this, and so is Bitcoin. The only difference is liquidity and growth potential.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gaslight_gasfeez
· 01-09 10:43
Really? Is $42 per ounce locked in? That's a pretty bold move.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 01-09 03:39
Whoa, locked at 42 bucks until the 1940s? How much sleep do you need? It's time to wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 01-07 19:43
Damn, locking in $42 to the 1940s? Are you joking? Does the Federal Reserve really dare to entertain this idea?
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 01-06 14:30
Wait a minute... 18x? That's an incredible number. When was the last time we saw this?
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetector
· 01-06 14:23
honestly the $42 accounting trick screaming louder than any fed speech ever could... been reading between these lines since mt gox days and this smells like someone finally admitting the emperor's got no clothes
Reply0
CryingOldWallet
· 01-06 14:21
A $10 trillion black hole, what is the US trying to play at? Isn't printing money more straightforward?
---
$220,000 sounds pretty good, but the moment they dare to revalue gold, US bonds might be in trouble.
---
Is this the year for hard assets to make a comeback? Feels like this move is just a setup for something.
---
So, ultimately, is the US just admitting defeat? Conceding that paper money isn't strong enough anymore.
---
Wait, does this logic imply that gold taking off = crypto taking off? Then what am I waiting for?
---
The book value from the 1940s, hilarious. How much can it be hidden?
---
Liquidity overflow into crypto? Wake up, if US policy shifts, this whole thing is over.
---
Before BTC hits 220,000, we need to see the Fed's stance. Let's be realistic, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 01-06 14:05
Wow, that number of $42 is really amazing. How many years did it take to hold back, haha
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDroplets
· 01-06 14:04
Wait, is it really possible to reach 180,000-220,000 USD? Feels a bit too optimistic haha
#比特币与代币化黄金的对比 ⚡How Will the Gold Revaluation Storm Rewrite the Cryptocurrency Landscape?
Recently, a core message has been circulating in the financial circles: the US may revalue the book value of its gold reserves. What signals are hidden behind this seemingly ordinary accounting move?
$ETH $PEPE $BTC
**How absurd is the current situation comparison?**
▸Book value: $42 per ounce (locked in the 1940s)
▸Current market price: $4,400 per ounce
▸Potential asset release: over $1 trillion
This is not just a numbers game. When a country's balance sheet shows such a huge gap, what does it reflect? What does it mean for the financial system?
**Chain reactions at three levels**
First, liquidity. If this step is truly executed, it would artificially add assets supporting trillions of dollars. Historically, large-scale asset revaluations like this are usually accompanied by significant liquidity expansion—this can push up commodity prices, asset prices, and even trigger a new inflation cycle.
Second, monetary trust. When the largest reserve currency issuing country begins to reprice its gold assets, it sends a signal to global central banks: the importance of hard assets is rising. Once this expectation forms, the asset allocation logic of central banks may accelerate adjustments, and demand for US Treasuries could be pressured.
Third, asset flow. When gold breaks through key price levels, historical data shows that some traditional wealth flows into risk assets, especially emerging asset classes. This pattern has been repeatedly validated in crypto market cycles.
**Market preview direction**
If gold reaches the $5,000 level:
• The theoretical target range for Bitcoin valuation could be $180,000–$220,000
• Silver and mining stocks are expected to enter a Davis double play
• Liquidity-rich crypto assets like SOL, ETH will become the main recipients of spillover funds
(Referencing history: during the last similar easing cycle, mainstream crypto assets experienced an 18-fold increase)
**Core reflection**
All of this boils down to a simple logic: when fiat systems begin to actively acknowledge the value of hard assets, what does it indicate? It indicates that confidence in the value of money itself is retreating. In this big context, what assets are most attractive? Those that are inherently scarce and difficult to inflate.
Gold is like this, and so is Bitcoin. The only difference is liquidity and growth potential.
What would your judgment be?