2026-01-06 11:10:53

#数字资产动态追踪 Contract trading is a game where many fail because of one word—greed.

I turned 3000U into 280,000U not by luck, but by following five ironclad rules. These five are not suggestions; they are bottom lines.

First, let's talk about the trading logic. With a principal of 300U, I divide it into ten parts, each time using 30U with 100x leverage. Sounds fierce? But combined with these five rules, it becomes a controllable system.

**Rule 1: Stop-loss is a mandatory lesson**

When you reach the stop-loss point, do not hesitate. Don't expect a rebound to save you; the market won't stop because of your expectations. Cutting losses hurts, but a margin call will send you out immediately. Think clearly about which choice to make.

**Rule 2: When you keep losing, hit the brakes**

After five consecutive stop-losses, immediately turn off your phone. At this point, the market often falls into chaos. Continuing to trade is like flailing in a mud pit. Stop, take a sip of water, and the market will tell you what to do next.

**Rule 3: Take profits into your pocket**

Floating gains do not equal real earnings. The numbers on your account do not mean you truly own them. Take half of the 3000U profit when you earn it; only what is transferred to your wallet is truly yours.

**Rule 4: Not all markets are worth participating in**

100x leverage is like adding wings in a trending market, but in choppy conditions, it’s a ticking time bomb. When the direction is unclear, I choose to stay out. This is not cowardice; it’s giving myself the best chance to exit.

**Rule 5: Position control is fundamental**

Never open a position exceeding 10% of your principal each time. A 30U position allows me to lose without regret. More importantly, small positions bring stability and precise operations. When your mindset is chaotic, even the best strategy is useless.

Contracts are not places to survive on intuition and luck; they rely on discipline. Many people’s margin calls happen in an instant, but regret lasts a lifetime. Memorize these five rules, go all out when the market comes, and cut losses decisively in chaos. In this long-term battle in the crypto world, only then can you have a chance to laugh last.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 2h ago

That's right, the greed pit has trapped too many people. 100x leverage sounds exciting, but it's really a gamble with your life; the key is to have discipline. Stop-loss really requires a tough mindset. I used to be reluctant to cut, resulting in heavy losses. Now I understand deeply. The rule of shutting down after five consecutive mistakes, I respect it—it's more effective than any technical indicator. Withdrawing half is the most crucial; account figures can be deceptive. Real money is what counts.

View OriginalReply0

GweiObserver

· 15h ago

It sounds beautiful, but can 100x leverage really be controlled? I see many people start this way... --- I agree with the principle of locking in profits, but honestly, the rest feels a bit like mysticism. --- The five ironclad rules are well explained, but what really traps people isn't the rules themselves. --- Just turn off your phone after five mistakes? Haha, I remember myself making ten mistakes and still stubbornly holding on... --- A 28-fold increase from 3,000 to 280,000 is indeed outrageous, but I've heard this story too many times. --- I agree that position control is the most critical point; everything else is nonsense, haha. --- Living by discipline, dying from greed—that's no problem. --- 100x leverage in a volatile market is like a time bomb. That's correct, but the question is who can accurately judge it. --- Another success story, but no one talks about the 99 failed versions. --- It's heartbreaking that profits should be locked in; how many accounts show gains but can't withdraw them?

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 01-07 08:22

The stop-loss that hits the heart the most—how many people die because of overconfidence and luck Really, trading with a small position has truly changed my mindset. When I used to go all-in with a heavy position, my mind was completely unclear After five consecutive mistakes, I turn off my phone. I need to stick this one on the wall 100x leverage sounds exciting, but in uncertain markets, it's better to stay out of the market. Don't let greed kill you Withdrawing profits and taking them into your pocket is so important. Unrealized gains are not yours; only what's in your wallet counts

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-06 11:38

3000 times 28,000 sounds outrageous, but to be honest, among the five rules, stop-loss and position control are the most strict; the others are basic operations... The key is whether you can withstand those few consecutive stop-losses. Most people can't hold on past the second one and start adding positions to recover... 100x leverage is essentially a gambler's tool. Even with a strong mindset, encountering a black swan can still cause you to kneel. This guy has survived until today purely because of self-discipline... I agree with the idea of locking in profits; account numbers can be very misleading. One flash crash and the balance can turn negative... However, using $30U as the unit and opening at 100x leverage is indeed cautious. If it were me, I would have gone all-in long ago. That’s the gap...

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 01-06 11:37

actually the math here doesn't check out. 3k to 280k is ~9,233% returns but 100x leverage on 10% position sizing should theoretically cap you at way lower basis points per trade. if you're really doing this, you're either cherry-picking winners or the gas/slippage costs are obliterating your actual edge. run the numbers again.

Reply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-06 11:29

Listen, listen, 100x leverage making 280,000 sounds great, but I have one question — is this brother still playing now? --- Everyone understands stop-loss and such, but when executing, hands tremble. One or two times turn into ten, and the account disappears directly. --- "Make 3000U and withdraw half" — easy to say, but when you really make money, who’s willing to withdraw? Always want to earn a bit more, and in the end, you’re back to square one. --- Waiting on the sidelines? Sounds easy, but when you’re truly idle, you feel uneasy. Watching others make money makes your eyes turn red. --- I want to turn off my phone after five wrong attempts, but often the sixth attempt turns things around, doesn’t it? --- Controlling 10% position size is correct, but with contracts, the lighter the position, the more scattered the mentality, and eventually, it ends in liquidation. --- Five iron rules sound invincible, but in practice, it’s just two words — random. Greed kills people, but discipline can also starve you. --- The problem isn’t the rules; it’s that human desire is inherently bottomless. These five rules at best just delay the time until liquidation.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-06 11:20

Honestly, I've heard this logic too many times. How many people can actually execute it? Basically, it's greed acting up. Knowing you should cut losses but refusing to do so. Yeah, I agree with the position control part. A light position mindset is indeed more stable. 28 million U sounds great, but I want to know how many people followed during this cycle? Getting five wrong in a row and then turning off the phone sounds simple, but in real operation, very few can actually do it. However, the point about cashing out and taking profits is correct. Too many people's paper wealth illusions have been shattered. Five iron rules... feels like a post-hoc summary, doesn't it? The key is the mindset—more difficult to break through than any stop-loss line.

View OriginalReply0

Web3Educator

· 01-06 11:11

ngl the "discipline over luck" framing here hits different... as i always tell my students, position sizing isn't boring, it's literally the difference between generational wealth and rekt stories

Reply0