Cryptocurrency Exchange - The Mathematical Principle for Identifying "Premature Ejaculation" Men!

Design a program that classifies all investment targets, focusing only on those that can be managed. This is the first principle of investing. The programs used for classification can vary widely, but one thing is certain: no program can guarantee that all selected manageable targets will ultimately be exciting and successful 100% of the time, just as no program for selecting partners can ensure that all chosen partners will always lead to climax. Because any operational program inevitably faces the problem of “premature ejaculation,” just as any selection of partners inevitably faces the challenge of identifying “premature ejaculators.”

The reason why identifying “premature ejaculation” is so difficult, causing countless so-called experts to meet their demise, is that truly discovering it requires real, hands-on effort. It’s more complex and riskier than identifying ED. ED can be detected early without deep involvement, but “premature ejaculation” cannot; you must try it at least once. And this is a one-shot deal—just because it works once doesn’t guarantee it will work next time. Therefore, effective identification, early detection, and minimizing losses become top priorities. Many so-called experts claim that certain conditions will cause stocks to rise. But in reality, any situation has a high probability of leading to “premature ejaculation,” turning what was thought to be manageable into unmanageable, trapping the investor. Such scenarios are extremely common in investing.

So, how to identify “premature ejaculation” men? The primary method is strict capital management. Once “premature ejaculation” occurs, you must exit immediately, even if the situation suddenly improves and the target seems to climax again. You must do so because “premature ejaculation” is highly sensitive; a single unexpected factor can trigger it. To restart, you need to wait for a long refractory period or a lengthy correction. Even if the target continues to climax afterward, it wastes time—time that could be used to pursue other opportunities. The world isn’t limited to just one partner or one stock. Of course, what I’m discussing here are basic principles. If you have a strict phased entry and exit strategy, everything becomes simpler. Capital management involves many aspects, which I will analyze and introduce separately later. Here, I am discussing another aspect: how to avoid encountering “premature ejaculation” men in the investment field as much as possible.

The fundamental cause of “premature ejaculation” lies in the failure of the intervention process, which encounters abnormal situations that the program cannot handle. This is inevitable for all programs. When a program encounters anomalies, the probability of “premature ejaculation” can be determined through long-term data testing. The simplest method is flipping a coin—buy on heads, do not buy on tails—this counts as an intervention program, but its “premature ejaculation” rate is at least 50%. The real question is how to find an intervention program with a particularly low “premature ejaculation” rate. Unfortunately, any isolated program will not have a very low rate. If a program’s “premature ejaculation” rate is below 10%, it is considered top-tier. Using such a program, you can invest 10 times with at most one mistake. Such a program is very powerful and almost flawless.

But the situation isn’t as bleak as it seems. In mathematics, the multiplication principle can fully solve this problem. Suppose three independent programs have “premature ejaculation” rates of 30%, 40%, and 30%, respectively—these are quite ordinary, unremarkable programs. Then, the combined program’s “premature ejaculation” rate is 30% * 40% * 30% = 3.6%. This means that, with this program group, after 100 attempts, there will be fewer than 4 “premature ejaculation” events—an astonishing result. Even for selecting partners, such high efficiency would probably satisfy even Wu Zetian’s sister.

Now, the key question becomes: how to find these three mutually independent programs?

First, technical indicators, which are purely based on price and volume inputs, are not independent. You only need to select any one technical indicator to form a buy-sell program. For highly skilled traders, a candlestick chart with moving averages and volume is more meaningful than any technical indicator.

Second, no stock is truly independent. All stocks exist within certain relative valuation relationships in the entire market. Changes in these valuation relationships can also form a buy-sell system. This system is related to the flow of market funds; any system related to market capital flow cannot be independent of it.

Finally, you can choose fundamental analysis to form a “premature ejaculation” identification program. But this fundamental analysis isn’t just about company profits. As mentioned in previous issues, for example, Air China’s CEO, Li, who has a military background, wouldn’t let his stock fall below the issue price for long, and put options that are unlikely to be exercised are also part of the fundamental considerations. These are more important fundamentals, requiring a deeper understanding of market participants and human nature to master.

Of course, the three independent programs mentioned above are just casually written here. Anyone can design their own independent trading program groups. But the principle remains the same: the three programs must be mutually independent. For example, popularity indicators and capital flow are essentially the same thing; various technical indicators are interconnected. If you combine three non-independent programs, it’s meaningless. It’s like someone telling you that a partner with a big nose won’t have premature ejaculation, another says big ears won’t, and a third says a lot of facial hair won’t. If you choose partners based on these three criteria, even Wu Zetian’s wet nurse’s neighbor’s wet nurse’s neighbor’s wet nurse’s wet nurse’s wet nurse wouldn’t be satisfied. **$ELIZAOS **