2026-01-05 05:30:33

Many people have tried on-chain trading platforms, but the user experience varies greatly. An innovative trading protocol adopts a shared liquidity model, making users feel as smooth as using traditional liquidity pools. The key lies in its routing engine—through an intelligent price discovery mechanism, the stability of order matching is significantly improved. From placing an order to execution takes only 12 minutes; this number is not just a marketing gimmick but the result of years of continuous optimization in order matching, risk management, and system operations. The entire interaction process does not require users to understand the complex underlying architecture, which is true user-friendly design.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MergeConflict

· 01-08 05:00

12-minute成交？那滑点怎么样啊 --- Sharing liquidity sounds good, but I wonder if pulling the market will turn out to be another story --- A truly friendly design is one that doesn't make me look at the code audit report --- The routing engine optimization is indeed interesting, much more reliable than those previous projects --- Another "revolutionary" protocol, waiting to be wiped out by arbitrage bots --- It sounds good, but the key is whether it can survive the next bear market --- I've heard too many times about innovative liquidity models; transaction speed is the real strength --- Using traditional financial experience for on-chain trading, I like this idea

View OriginalReply0

QuorumVoter

· 01-08 02:51

12-minute transaction? Sounds good, but the key is how's the slippage --- I've heard this shared liquidity trick many times, but how many can actually be implemented successfully --- Always touting user-friendliness, but in the end, we're the ones filling the gaps --- Is the routing engine reliable? Is there data comparison or is it just another PPT project --- Talking all these fancy words, I just want to know if it will suddenly crash and run away

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-07 10:04

12 minutes to complete a transaction? Sounds good, but have you actually used it? It really needs to be faster than traditional trading to count. Is this routing engine reliable or just another marketing buzzword? Liquidity mode is easy to understand, the key is no slippage. --- Shared liquidity sounds high-end, but how does it actually perform? --- No need to understand the underlying architecture? Then how do I know where the problem is? --- More optimization again, when will it truly become stable? --- 12 minutes isn't fast, I've seen faster ones. --- User-friendly design sounds great, but it depends on real trading data. --- Has this protocol been audited or is it just another scam to cut the leeks? --- Liquidity sharing is indeed attractive, but I'm worried about slippage issues. --- Not understanding the architecture can be dangerous, who knows where the losses come from.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 01-05 05:59

12-minute transaction? Sounds good, but have you actually used it? --- No matter how smart the routing engine is, it can't withstand outrageous gas fees. --- Sharing liquidity sounds fresh, but I wonder how the slippage is. --- Another user-friendly promotional design, but at critical moments, nothing is friendly. --- This set of tools can only be praised if it survives in a bear market. --- Order matching has been optimized for so long, why hasn't anyone heard of it? --- 12 minutes? It takes my wallet 5 minutes just to confirm, haha. --- Good experience, but what about security? --- It seems like it's trying to solve a problem that doesn't even exist. --- Talking about TVL and daily trading volume isn't very reliable either.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 01-05 05:53

12-minute transaction? Sounds good, but is it really stable? --- Sharing liquidity sounds a bit empty, has it actually been tested? --- I've heard the routing engine thing countless times; the key is how well slippage is controlled. --- Another one claiming to be user-friendly, but in the end, you still need to read the documentation. --- Years of optimization only lead to 12 minutes? The "years" in crypto are a bit exaggerated, haha. --- Not understanding the underlying architecture is dangerous, I have to say. --- The liquidity sharing model sounds a bit new, won't it just be a scam? --- Fast transactions ≠ good trading experience, what about gas fees and transaction costs? --- They boast loudly, but how much real on-chain data is there? Show me two examples. --- Most innovative protocols have pitfalls; whoever goes first to try the new thing is the unlucky one.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 01-05 05:53

12 minutes? Faster than the last time I waited for gas fees haha

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 01-05 05:50

12 minutes to complete a transaction? Sounds unbelievable, is it real? The routing engine is awesome, but what about the slippage, friends? Sharing liquidity sounds good, but have you actually used it, everyone? I've heard this kind of pitch too many times, is it reliable? Really? User-friendly? I just want to know how the gas fees are calculated.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-0717ab66

· 01-05 05:41

12-minute transaction? I feel like some on-chain platforms are still waiting for 24 hours.

View OriginalReply0