Recently, many liquidity miners have been complaining about a phenomenon: after finally investing funds into liquidity pools to earn fees, over half a year, the tokens have become fewer and the value in USDT terms has actually lost money.
At first glance, this is what is called "impermanent loss," which seems to be related to market fluctuations. But a deeper analysis of on-chain data reveals that the real "culprit" is something else—arbitrage bots systematically siphoning off LP profits through time difference exploitation.
The scenario is as follows: whenever the price on centralized exchanges changes, the oracle on the DEX responds a beat late. During this gap, high-frequency bots step in—buying low and selling high—quickly draining the fees you've painstakingly earned. Essentially, your price update mechanism is too slow, turning your system into an automatic ATM for arbitrageurs.
This is also why some projects are starting to upgrade their oracles. Instead of passively waiting for scheduled updates, they opt for proactive measures. They adopt a "push + pull" dual-mode system—using push updates daily to maintain on-chain state; but when off-chain prices fluctuate sharply, the system automatically pulls the latest quotes at the moment a trade is initiated.
The brilliance lies in this mechanism: price updates and trade executions happen within the same block, completely closing the time difference window for bots. Coupled with a hybrid off-chain calculation and on-chain verification approach, the defense system is quite robust, leaving arbitrageurs with no room to breathe.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BrokeBeans
· 01-07 10:12
I was drained by the robot again, huh... I should have thought of that earlier.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 01-06 09:24
Damn, so I was being drained by a robot, no wonder I lost so badly in that pool.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-05 05:54
Haha, basically it's just being drained by robots. All the so-called impermanent loss is just a smokescreen.
LPs are walking ATMs, it cracks me up.
Oracle upgrades sound very hardcore, but arbitrageurs will always find new time gaps. It's an eternal arms race.
I want to see who can truly block the robot's entry point. So far, I haven't seen a fully effective solution.
The supply and demand curve looks good in textbooks, but in reality, liquidity mining is a gamble in the digital age.
Executing within the same block? It sounds like using a concept to package the same problem. I'll keep observing.
What about the Web3 decentralization spirit? Instead, it's been turned into a new form of capital monopoly by high-frequency robots.
Honestly, if this defense mechanism were really that strong, project teams would have started promoting it long ago. What does it mean that they're still researching it?
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJack
· 01-05 05:53
honestly this is why i stopped touching regular lps like 2 years ago... those bots are relentless fr
wait so they're actually shipping push-pull oracles? that's... actually™ non-trivial. finally someone gets it
the dual-mode oracle thing hits different ngl, atomic price updates would've saved me thousands back then lmao
Reply0
hodl_therapist
· 01-05 05:52
It's another robot snatching money; our LPs are just like leeks.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 01-05 05:49
Damn, this is the real truth. I used to think I lost everything to impermanent loss, but it turns out I was being drained by bots.
Bots are the parasites of DEXs. When oracles slow down, they get exploited. This dual-mode setup actually sounds pretty innovative.
Push and pull, executed within the same block. Now bots have no loopholes left. Finally, someone is standing up for LPs.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-05 05:43
This oracle upgrade is really aggressive; finally, someone has taken action against the robots.
Recently, many liquidity miners have been complaining about a phenomenon: after finally investing funds into liquidity pools to earn fees, over half a year, the tokens have become fewer and the value in USDT terms has actually lost money.
At first glance, this is what is called "impermanent loss," which seems to be related to market fluctuations. But a deeper analysis of on-chain data reveals that the real "culprit" is something else—arbitrage bots systematically siphoning off LP profits through time difference exploitation.
The scenario is as follows: whenever the price on centralized exchanges changes, the oracle on the DEX responds a beat late. During this gap, high-frequency bots step in—buying low and selling high—quickly draining the fees you've painstakingly earned. Essentially, your price update mechanism is too slow, turning your system into an automatic ATM for arbitrageurs.
This is also why some projects are starting to upgrade their oracles. Instead of passively waiting for scheduled updates, they opt for proactive measures. They adopt a "push + pull" dual-mode system—using push updates daily to maintain on-chain state; but when off-chain prices fluctuate sharply, the system automatically pulls the latest quotes at the moment a trade is initiated.
The brilliance lies in this mechanism: price updates and trade executions happen within the same block, completely closing the time difference window for bots. Coupled with a hybrid off-chain calculation and on-chain verification approach, the defense system is quite robust, leaving arbitrageurs with no room to breathe.