FET/USDT's recent trend is interesting. Multiple timeframes have triggered overbought warning signals — the 1-hour RSI surged to 81, the 4-hour even more exaggerated at 84, while the 15-minute RSI remains at 68, appearing relatively mild. At first glance, it seems ready to take off, but the problem is: the 1-hour MACD histogram is shrinking, and trading volume has even decreased by 73.5%, indicating that fewer people are chasing the high, and the momentum is insufficient.
Looking at the technical position: Currently stuck at the 0.29 resistance level. Above that, there are two more hurdles at 0.295 and 0.305. Support levels below are at 0.285 and 0.275.
My strategy is this — if the price really breaks through 0.295, I will follow with a light position, aiming for 0.305, but set a stop-loss at 0.288 to prevent unexpected moves. Conversely, if it falls below 0.285, I will switch to shorting, targeting 0.275, with a stop-loss at 0.292. As for the price oscillating between 0.285 and 0.295, I choose to observe and not rush into trades.
The current situation is actually quite awkward; overbought conditions are real, and volume is declining. Chasing the risk at this point is too dangerous. I prefer to wait for a breakout to act, letting the price tell us what the real direction is.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-08 05:09
With such a shrinking volume, do you still dare to chase? I think they really want to experience the gentle destruction of a shitcoin.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 01-07 19:42
With such weak volume, do you still want to take off? Haha
---
RSI is soaring, but the trading volume has directly shrunk. I am very familiar with this strange feeling.
---
0.285 to 0.295 is a dead zone; a break below is the real signal.
---
Wait, wait, I just like to watch these awkward dips; the price will speak for itself.
---
Overbought + decreasing volume—when this combo appears, I know a crash is coming. I’d rather miss out than get trapped.
---
I agree with the suggestion to add a small position, but currently, everyone entering is just a bagholder.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 01-07 14:50
Trading volume shrank by 73%, which is quite awkward; can't chase it anymore.
Before the breakdown, I chose to lie low and let the price speak for itself.
RSI is overbought but no one is following up, a typical false high; wait for a reverse signal before acting.
If 0.285 breaks, go short—this logic has no flaws.
Feels like FET is squeezing the bubble; it's not the time for me to bottom fish.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 01-06 19:44
Still daring to chase after a 73.5% decrease in volume? This is just the prelude to harvesting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveraged
· 01-05 05:54
Trading volume declines by 73.5%, yet still daring to chase, isn't this just the rhythm of bagholders?
---
RSI has already reached 84 and still hasn't broken down, this is the most terrifying part.
---
It's right to stay on the sidelines; rushing in now just waiting to be washed out.
---
Only act after a breakdown; I approve of this logic—no greed, no loss.
---
Stuck at 0.29 for so long, it feels like either a sharp surge or a crash; I choose to sleep through the oscillation.
---
Trading volume shrinks, chasing highs now must be fools.
---
Wait for a breakthrough at 0.295 before considering entering; current actions are purely gambler's psychology.
---
With such a volume, still want to push to 0.305? Not realistic.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 01-05 05:52
With such a shrinking volume, do you still dare to chase? I think it's uncertain; let's wait until it breaks the support level.
View OriginalReply0
Blockwatcher9000
· 01-05 05:51
Still daring to chase after a 73.5% decrease in volume? This is the rhythm of cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 01-05 05:45
A 73.5% decrease in volume; chasing the high is just giving it away. Waiting for a breakdown before buying again is the right move.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 01-05 05:41
With such weak volume, how dare they push forward? The rebound trap is too obvious.
I'm also observing this wave; I'll decide after a break below.
RSI is overbought but trading volume is plummeting? Isn't this about to collapse?
Wait for a clear signal before taking action; there's no need to gamble.
Honestly, everyone who enters now is gambling, but I don't gamble.
I only consider shorting if 0.285 breaks; those resistance levels above are left untouched for now.
A decline in trading volume with fewer people is the most dangerous signal, okay?
FET/USDT's recent trend is interesting. Multiple timeframes have triggered overbought warning signals — the 1-hour RSI surged to 81, the 4-hour even more exaggerated at 84, while the 15-minute RSI remains at 68, appearing relatively mild. At first glance, it seems ready to take off, but the problem is: the 1-hour MACD histogram is shrinking, and trading volume has even decreased by 73.5%, indicating that fewer people are chasing the high, and the momentum is insufficient.
Looking at the technical position:
Currently stuck at the 0.29 resistance level. Above that, there are two more hurdles at 0.295 and 0.305. Support levels below are at 0.285 and 0.275.
My strategy is this — if the price really breaks through 0.295, I will follow with a light position, aiming for 0.305, but set a stop-loss at 0.288 to prevent unexpected moves. Conversely, if it falls below 0.285, I will switch to shorting, targeting 0.275, with a stop-loss at 0.292. As for the price oscillating between 0.285 and 0.295, I choose to observe and not rush into trades.
The current situation is actually quite awkward; overbought conditions are real, and volume is declining. Chasing the risk at this point is too dangerous. I prefer to wait for a breakout to act, letting the price tell us what the real direction is.