Recently, a DePIN project is about to launch on a major exchange, and I want to give everyone a detailed look at the true situation of this project.



First, let's look at the hard data: the project has been operating stably for over a year, with annual revenue surpassing $1 million, and 2.4 million monthly active users, indicating that there are indeed real users. In terms of funding, it has raised approximately $8 million, backed by well-known institutions like DWF Labs and Outlier Ventures, which suggests a solid financing background.

The token design is quite interesting—it incorporates a deflationary burn mechanism, and the token itself supports multiple use cases such as payments, governance, and staking, not just a pure meme coin. The project has already covered over 190 countries and regions, and operates in a no-KYC mode, which offers significant expansion potential for this business model. Since the TGE, it has been gradually listing on multiple exchanges, and its ecosystem layout is also expanding.

But here’s the problem—there is almost no public information about the founding team, which is a major risk factor. The details of token distribution are also somewhat vague, and the transparency of circulating supply is insufficient. Although there are historical records of airdrops, with 2% of the total supply reserved for subscribers, the specific distribution plan has not been fully disclosed.

Another point to watch out for: during the initial TGE, the price experienced quite volatile swings, and the influence of market makers should not be underestimated. Entering at this stage requires careful risk management. Overall, this is a project with actual revenue support, and its tokenomics are commendable, but the team’s level of secrecy is a bit excessive. Those interested should keep a close eye.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityWorkervip
· 01-07 21:56
The data looks good, but the team is hiding things too deeply. I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
Degentlemanvip
· 01-05 18:31
The data looks good, but the team is hidden. I've seen this trick many times.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadowvip
· 01-05 05:51
The data looks good, but the founder is hiding. I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhalevip
· 01-05 05:48
The data looks good, but the team's black box approach really can't hold up. Do they really have to play the mysterious persona?
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMakervip
· 01-05 05:43
Earning over a million annually with over two million active users per month sounds impressive, but I really can't risk the founding team remaining anonymous.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 01-05 05:29
theoretically speaking, if we map this token's deflationary mechanics onto a recursive SNARK framework, the opacity around founder identity becomes mathematically... troublesome? 240m mau is sexy but the lack of transparent vesting schedules feels like an incomplete zero-knowledge proof—what's being hidden in that cryptographic shadow?
Reply0
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 01-05 05:24
The data looks good, but if the team is hiding things, it becomes a bit suspicious. I've seen this trick too many times before.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)