A key misconception about US dollar liquidity needs to be corrected: don't just focus on the changes in the Fed's balance sheet figures, as that is only superficial. The true dollar liquidity, in essence, depends on whether financial institutions (especially global systemically important banks) are willing and able to expand their balance sheets under the current risk environment.
In other words, printing money by the Federal Reserve is a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one. The crucial factor is whether financial intermediaries are willing to take on the baton—their risk appetite, financing costs, regulatory constraints—all these factors determine whether liquidity can truly flow into the market. When these institutions tighten their balance sheets, even if the central bank is printing money wildly, the market may fall into a liquidity trap. The reverse is also true.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SolidityStruggler
· 01-07 05:34
When banks are unwilling to expand their balance sheets, printing more money is useless. That's the real truth.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 01-07 05:19
Bankers are uncooperative; no matter how aggressive the Fed is, it's useless... That's why last year's liquidity crisis was so outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 01-05 04:56
Alright, basically it means banks are unwilling to lend money; printing more won't help.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 01-05 04:54
That's exactly right, and 99% of people misunderstand this point. Banks are unwilling to lend, and printing more money by the central bank is useless; it truly is a liquidity trap.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 01-05 04:53
No matter how fast the printing press spins, it doesn't matter; the key is whether banks are willing to lend money.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-05 04:52
Banks are uncooperative; no matter how much the central bank prints, it's useless... That's why we didn't see any liquidity in 2023.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 01-05 04:41
This is the real insider's perspective. Most retail investors have been staring at M2 for a long time and still don't understand anything.
Printing more money by the central bank is useless; the key is whether the big banks are willing to lend out money.
Honestly, with banks shrinking their balance sheets now, no wonder liquidity is so tight.
We were just discussing this, and finally someone pointed out that printing money ≠ abundant liquidity; these are two different things.
This is why sometimes, even when the central bank appears to be easing monetary policy, the market actually feels more distressed.
When banks are unwilling to take on risk, no matter how much base money there is, it can't flow into the market. It's frustrating.
A key misconception about US dollar liquidity needs to be corrected: don't just focus on the changes in the Fed's balance sheet figures, as that is only superficial. The true dollar liquidity, in essence, depends on whether financial institutions (especially global systemically important banks) are willing and able to expand their balance sheets under the current risk environment.
In other words, printing money by the Federal Reserve is a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one. The crucial factor is whether financial intermediaries are willing to take on the baton—their risk appetite, financing costs, regulatory constraints—all these factors determine whether liquidity can truly flow into the market. When these institutions tighten their balance sheets, even if the central bank is printing money wildly, the market may fall into a liquidity trap. The reverse is also true.