Recently, FLOKI's performance has been quite interesting. I held it overnight, and the results were good, but the liquidity is clearly falling behind, so an adjustment is probably needed. The current strategy is to reduce positions gradually and set the stop-loss at 0.006. Although this approach seems a bit conservative, waking up to some gains still feels pretty good. The market rhythm is indeed changing, and we have to keep up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SolidityNewbie
· 01-08 01:13
Hmm, the 0.006 level is well grasped, but I'm worried that a rebound might lead to another round of manipulation.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 01-05 10:54
If liquidity can't keep up, you have to run, or you'll get stuck and no one will save you.
View OriginalReply0
舍得就是格局
· 01-05 05:14
Gradually reducing positions is still a reliable strategy. The stop-loss at 0.006 is well-placed, but I'm a bit worried that insufficient liquidity might cause a dump.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 01-05 04:54
Gradually reducing positions is still a reliable strategy. The stop-loss at 0.006 is well-placed, but I'm a bit worried that insufficient liquidity might cause a dump.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBot
· 01-05 04:53
If liquidity can't keep up, be cautious. The 0.006 level is quite well defended.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 01-05 04:44
Hmm, I'm also watching the 0.006 level, but the liquidity in this wave has indeed been disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollector
· 01-05 04:41
Gradually reducing positions is still a safe move, but is a 0.006 stop-loss a bit tight?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-05 04:37
When liquidity can't keep up, gradually reducing positions is indeed the optimal solution. However, have you considered the capital efficiency of the 0.006 stop-loss level? It feels like it can still be optimized.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 01-05 04:33
The method of reducing positions in batches is okay, but I'm worried about liquidity suddenly plunging.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 01-05 04:29
Liquidity issues are really annoying. A stop loss at 0.006 is safe and steady, but I feel this wave of market movement isn't over yet.
Recently, FLOKI's performance has been quite interesting. I held it overnight, and the results were good, but the liquidity is clearly falling behind, so an adjustment is probably needed. The current strategy is to reduce positions gradually and set the stop-loss at 0.006. Although this approach seems a bit conservative, waking up to some gains still feels pretty good. The market rhythm is indeed changing, and we have to keep up.