2026-01-05 03:29:02

$COLLECT This wave of short positions was tightly controlled at the bottom area, directly earning 20 points of profit!

Currently, there is still about 15 points of upward space. In my opinion, conservative traders can consider taking profits in batches at this position.

However, for those who want to take a chance, you can leave 30% of your position to continue following the trend and see if it can break through this key level at 0.07. If it really breaks, there might still be a chance later.

Yesterday's market was also good, with both bulls and bears having opportunities to profit, and the result was very satisfying. In this market, following the rhythm gives you a chance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SellLowExpert

· 01-06 17:58

20 points and you should run, the end result of greed is always getting cut off.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 01-06 10:24

Running at 20 points, but still feel like it's a bit conservative...

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 01-05 03:57

Take down 20 points directly; keeping up with this pace is money.

View OriginalReply0

0xOverleveraged

· 01-05 03:41

Run after 20 points? I'm the reverse operation guy here, breaking 0.07 is not a problem, the key is whether you dare to hold on or not.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentSage

· 01-05 03:40

Bro, you're leaving at 20 points? I'm honestly a bit nervous.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingSerious

· 01-05 03:34

Holding firmly at the bottom, this technique is indeed effective, with a steady 20 points. I just want to know if I can continue to ride this wave of profit later on.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 01-05 03:30

Running at 20 points is okay, but I don't think the 0.07 level is that easy to break through.

View OriginalReply0