2026-01-04 17:21:30

Early morning push notifications bombard you: the international situation is once again turbulent, with the smell of geopolitical conflict and gunpowder in the air. Every time this happens, the crypto community starts to get restless—"Good news for mainstream coins! Time to buy the dip!" Little do they realize, such impulsiveness often ends in heavy losses.

But this time, I want to look at it from a different perspective. When information is everywhere, and truth is hard to discern, we should ask ourselves: which assets are truly trustworthy? What can maintain consistency amid chaos?

The answer might be more fundamental than you think: data. Specifically, on-chain real data that cannot be tampered with or manipulated by centralized authorities. Imagine if even international news can be interpreted by different parties as "the truth they want," then wouldn't there also be a risk of price data on exchanges, contract terms, and asset information being "adjusted"? This is not just paranoia, but a real hidden danger.

This is also why I have recently placed particular emphasis on the on-chain oracle sector. Its logic is straightforward: through a global, decentralized network of nodes, it cryptographically verifies key real-world information—oil prices, exchange rates, commodity market data—and synchronizes it to the blockchain in its original form. No intermediaries, no black boxes, no room for "adjustments."

The more the world is plunged into uncertainty, the more we need such a reliable data infrastructure. Oracles won't change their tune because of political winds, nor will they be manipulated behind the scenes by centralized institutions. They are the "data bulletproof vest"—their value becomes even more apparent during turbulent times.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-07 02:46

That's right, every time there's a geopolitical conflict, someone suffers heavy losses, and yet some still shout about positive signals. I'm truly convinced. Oracles really need to be carefully examined; reliable data is the foundation. Honestly, who dares to trust 100% the prices on exchanges? There are too many black-box operations. I'm also starting to set up related oracles; I feel it's the right move. The information war in the crypto world is so fierce, it's better to rely on something immutable to avoid being exploited.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 01-06 19:33

Oracles are indeed seriously underestimated in this cycle, to be honest. Real data is worth more than anything, especially in chaotic times.

View OriginalReply0

TrustlessMaximalist

· 01-05 03:11

That's right. Every time there's a geopolitical turmoil, the crypto market gets chaotic, and many people suffer heavy losses like this. The idea of oracles really hits the point, but honestly, on-chain data isn't absolutely neutral either. What is the true foundation of trust? It's really about consensus. Impulsive bottom-fishing is truly the number one killer in the crypto world. There are opportunities in the oracle track, but it also depends on who does it and how they do it. This wave of geopolitical tension really makes people anxious, but those who bought out of panic are already regretting it. Data infrastructure is important, but the key is having enough nodes to truly maintain it. Honestly, compared to oracles, I value projects that focus on practical applications more. Decentralization sounds good, but in reality, interests are still at play. Every time these situations occur, you can see who truly understands and who is just riding the hype. When the smell of gunpowder is thick, it's actually the clearest moment. Reliable infrastructure will never go out of style, I agree with that.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 01-04 17:42

Here we go again. Every time the geopolitical situation tightens, the crypto circle starts talking about bottom fishing. Is this time really different? I remain skeptical. Speaking of oracles, they do have a point—on-chain data is always harder to fake than exchange price data. Wait, your logic is that if news can be interpreted differently, then oracles could also be manipulated? This self-questioning just dug a hole for yourself, haha. Honestly, compared to bulletproof armor, I trust my own wallet more. A strategy of not trading and not holding has never let me down. Everyone wants a "reliable data foundation," but "reliable" itself is a false proposition. If you believe it, then you believe; if not, then you're just playing games. I've been watching this track, mainly to see who will be the next to be liquidated. Can oracles really be tampered with? Laughable. As long as there's profit, absolute decentralization doesn't exist. Don't be too naive.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-04 17:31

Really, every time there is a geopolitical conflict, the crypto community starts to gamble. It’s infuriating to think about it. Oracles have indeed been underestimated. Everyone is chasing new coins but ignoring the most fundamental issue of data credibility. For those who say "it's not a doomsday prediction," they’ve actually seen through the black box of exchanges long ago. The more chaotic it gets, the more on-chain truth is needed. I agree with this logic. By the way, your thinking is much more advanced than most news reports, not just simple "buy buy buy." It’s really about betting on the value of information transparency, relying on it. The myth of bottom-fishing is back. The ones who will suffer heavy losses by this time next year are definitely the same group. The analogy of data as a bulletproof vest is good, but it also depends on who wears it...

View OriginalReply0

FastLeaver

· 01-04 17:30

Hmm... It's the same old "bottom-fishing" rhetoric again. Last time I said that, I lost two months' salary. It's hilarious. Oracles do have some real value; I agree that the data can't be altered. I just wonder if the nodes themselves will have issues. Speaking of which, when it comes to information warfare, is on-chain data really secure? It seems like multi-chain verification is still necessary. Decentralization sounds great, but in reality, you can't escape human factors... What do you all think? Do you trust the oracle system? After this geopolitical conflict, we need to look at the long term. Don't get washed out again by short-term fluctuations.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-04 17:27

I understand this logic, oracles are indeed an underestimated track. --- It's that "bottom fishing" time again... Always like this, waiting for me to wake up. --- Data armor? Sounds good, but oracles themselves can also be manipulated. --- Centralized exchange data has always been a black box, this has been known for a long time. --- Damn, someone finally said it. In the era of information warfare, having a trustworthy data source is indeed necessary. --- I need to do more research on oracles; there's a high chance I've been fooled. --- Every major event in the crypto world causes turmoil, repeatedly suffering losses and still learning... Forget it. --- This set of logic sounds perfect, but the reality is that oracle nodes can also have issues. --- Decentralization sounds great, but in reality, some nodes always seem to hold more power. --- That's right, but I still don't trust any on-chain data; it's all a scam. --- Wow, this is true foundational thinking, enlightening. --- Oracle? I only trust my own trading system.

View OriginalReply0