Looking at this set of market data, the on-chain perpetual trading ecosystem is forming a "tripartite" situation.
Hyperliquid ($HYPE), Aster ($ASTER), and Lighter ($LIT) each hold a market share of around 13% to 15%, with daily trading volumes reaching approximately 3 billion USD. The true differences become apparent in the dimensions of "revenue quality" and "valuation alignment."
Aster's position is particularly interesting.
Hyperliquid has become a blue-chip player in the sector, with its valuation largely priced in by the market. Lighter is still in the subsidy-driven stage, and the platform is exploring its path. Aster, on the other hand, maintains stable revenue growth, yet its market cap is still within a growth valuation range, resulting in an annualized revenue-to-market cap ratio of over 19%, making it the most attractive among the three.
The logic behind this is not complicated. Aster is positioned at the front door of a major exchange ecosystem, with natural customer acquisition advantages, a healthier user structure, and a more stable risk control system. It mainly attracts long-term market makers and genuinely active traders, rather than traffic driven by "scalping" or arbitrage.
When the perpetual DEX market shifts from incremental to stock competition, platforms with stable cash flow models are more likely to sustain continuous increases in valuation and market share.
In simple terms: Hyperliquid has defined this sector, Lighter is experimenting with various approaches, and Aster is steadily strengthening its position as a value hub.
As new players like DCEX continue to emerge, the concentration of leading positions will only intensify. Platforms with ecosystem moats and actual cash flow are likely to become the core beneficiaries of this upcoming wave of structural revaluation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWallflower
· 01-05 16:13
Aster's position is indeed interesting; a 19% yield is definitely different when benchmarked against HYPE's pricing.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 01-04 17:50
Aster's valuation undervalue is truly amazing, with a 19% annualized income share. The data is right here.
A series of aggressive moves, and then you realize Aster owns shares—laugh out loud. It’s indeed the hidden champion in the track.
Hype has already been priced in, and Aster still has room for imagination. This is what we call information asymmetry.
But on the other hand, real traders versus sheep-shearing traffic—this distinction is really sharp.
The era of cash flow being king has arrived. The ecological moat is really valuable.
Lighter is still subsidizing and throwing money around; something feels a bit off...
Wait, is Aster really the chosen one? Is the ecological front door so attractive?
Remember those platforms with an average daily turnover of 3 billion? What happened to them later?
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-04 17:50
The 19%+ annualized return share of aster is indeed outstanding. This is truly a genuine value hotspot.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 01-04 17:46
actually statistically speaking, aster's 19%+ yield-to-mcap ratio feels almost taxonomically suspicious... like, where's the catch here? per my analysis spreadsheets, that valuation gap shouldn't exist if the market was functioning efficiently—feels more like an arbitrage mispricing waiting to get corrected downward rather than upward, ngl
Reply0
MrRightClick
· 01-04 17:42
Aster's valuation hotspot is indeed interesting, with over 19% of revenue share looking quite tempting.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-04 17:41
Aster's position is indeed excellent; cash flow is the key.
Looking at this set of market data, the on-chain perpetual trading ecosystem is forming a "tripartite" situation.
Hyperliquid ($HYPE), Aster ($ASTER), and Lighter ($LIT) each hold a market share of around 13% to 15%, with daily trading volumes reaching approximately 3 billion USD. The true differences become apparent in the dimensions of "revenue quality" and "valuation alignment."
Aster's position is particularly interesting.
Hyperliquid has become a blue-chip player in the sector, with its valuation largely priced in by the market. Lighter is still in the subsidy-driven stage, and the platform is exploring its path. Aster, on the other hand, maintains stable revenue growth, yet its market cap is still within a growth valuation range, resulting in an annualized revenue-to-market cap ratio of over 19%, making it the most attractive among the three.
The logic behind this is not complicated. Aster is positioned at the front door of a major exchange ecosystem, with natural customer acquisition advantages, a healthier user structure, and a more stable risk control system. It mainly attracts long-term market makers and genuinely active traders, rather than traffic driven by "scalping" or arbitrage.
When the perpetual DEX market shifts from incremental to stock competition, platforms with stable cash flow models are more likely to sustain continuous increases in valuation and market share.
In simple terms: Hyperliquid has defined this sector, Lighter is experimenting with various approaches, and Aster is steadily strengthening its position as a value hub.
As new players like DCEX continue to emerge, the concentration of leading positions will only intensify. Platforms with ecosystem moats and actual cash flow are likely to become the core beneficiaries of this upcoming wave of structural revaluation.