2026-01-04 16:24:13

A $1 incentive proposal was recently approved with a high vote rate of 77.75%, reflecting the WLFI community's actual influence in governance. The logic behind it is simple—when token holders carefully evaluate each proposal and actively participate in discussions, the direction of the entire ecosystem is in everyone's hands.

This is not a decision made unilaterally by a team, but genuine democratic practice. What does the voting result indicate? It shows that this governance mechanism can indeed promote growth. The community has a voice, proposals stand the test, and ultimately consensus is reached—this process itself proves the feasibility of decentralized governance. The future direction of WLFI is ultimately determined by the community's will. Your choices are the direction of the ecosystem.

WLFI0,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainGossiper

· 01-06 17:06

77.75% voter turnout sounds good, but what is the actual percentage of people who participated in the voting?

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 01-05 23:41

77.75% voter turnout is pretty good, indicating that everyone is taking it seriously, unlike some projects that are just self-indulgent. By the way, a proposal worth $1 can also get such high participation? It seems the community still has some potential. The real challenge of decentralized governance lies here, relying on everyone not to be lazy. Hey, when will there be a big proposal? Just looking at small ones isn't very meaningful.

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 01-04 16:53

77.75%? This voting turnout is indeed impressive, indicating that everyone is still taking it seriously. True democracy is when everyone can voice their opinions. The WLFI mechanism seems to be genuinely following this path. Community steering, transparent decision-making—that's what Web3 should look like, right?

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-04 16:52

77.75% voter turnout is indeed impressive, but we need to see what the proposal behind the $1 incentive actually looks like. --- Real democratic practice? Uh... okay, I believe you for now, just hope it doesn't turn into a game for big players. --- Community will determines the direction of the ecosystem. That sounds nice, but I'm worried it will ultimately be decided by insiders. --- There are quite a few people who vote without participating in discussions. Don't hype up the 77% too much. --- Interesting, interesting. This is what decentralization should look like, right? --- Wait, are people just voting for the $1 incentive? I need to evaluate whether the ROI of this proposal is worth it. --- Hey, token holders actively participating? Why do I feel most are still passive? --- I love seeing consensus being reached, but we need to guard against voting fatigue drowning out genuine voices.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-04 16:41

ngl the $1 proposal passing at 77.75% is giving genuine governance signal... not just theater like most chains. when holders actually show up, the alchemy happens. that's the real yield right there—community actually steering the ship instead of larping decentralization.

Reply0