Many people only see the surface excitement of geopolitical conflicts, but Wall Street focuses on the numbers. Especially at this moment, understanding the economic logic behind U.S. foreign policy is actually understanding the capital markets — and thereby understanding the next move of Bitcoin.
The most straightforward example: Why do capital markets prefer "precision strikes" over traditional warfare? Both involve conflict on the surface, but the economic implications are completely different.
**Huge Differences in Cost Structure**
What does traditional warfare (taking Iraq as an example) entail? Trillions of dollars in fiscal deficits. Where does this money come from? Printing money. Once the Federal Reserve initiates quantitative easing, inflation soars, and the dollar depreciates. This is a double whammy for U.S. stocks and bonds, while boosting gold and safe-haven assets.
But precision strikes are different. The cost might only be tens of millions of dollars, almost no pressure on the U.S. fiscal budget. What is the market’s reaction? It sees the efficient operation of U.S. power and the reinforcement of dollar hegemony. At this point, the dollar index strengthens, U.S. Treasury yields rise, and investors sell off gold and safe assets, shifting to the dollar and U.S. stocks.
What about Bitcoin? In a strong dollar environment, risk assets come under pressure. This is the basic logic.
**Long-term Significance of Restructuring the Energy Supply Chain**
But this is not the deepest logic. The most critical factor is energy.
Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but these oil flows are now blocked. Why? Sanctions. The current regime is sanctioned by major Western countries, causing Venezuela, a major supplier, to be absent from the global oil market.
If the situation changes and a pro-Western new regime comes to power and sanctions are lifted, what will happen? Global oil supply will suddenly increase, putting pressure on crude oil prices. Inflation expectations will decline, and the dollar will strengthen further. Looking at risk assets linked to inflation — including Bitcoin — they will also face adjustment pressures.
**Short-term vs. Long-term Market Pricing**
How will the markets react this year? There may be some volatility in the short term, but once this "strong dollar + low inflation expectations" pattern is established, risk assets may generally enter a correction phase. Gold will be suppressed, and Bitcoin will find it hard to remain unaffected.
In the long run, everything depends on the Federal Reserve’s policy path. But for now, geopolitics is essentially signaling price signals to the capital markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 01-06 16:27
Wow, this logical chain is so clear it's a bit scary. The Federal Reserve's superficial actions, from another perspective, are directly manipulating Bitcoin prices.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 01-05 00:13
The Wall Street crowd really treats geopolitical issues as an ATM. Retail investors are still just watching the show.
Whenever the strong dollar appears, Bitcoin has to kneel. This logic isn't really new.
If Venezuela really loosens up, oil prices drop, and Bitcoin will probably follow suit. Those holding coins should be mentally prepared.
The US has really played the energy card to the fullest. Changing sanctions policies can control global pricing power. It's outrageous.
Once inflation expectations reverse, all risk assets will tumble. No matter how bullish Bitcoin is, it can't escape this fate.
Frankly, geopolitical conflicts are the barometer of the market. Politicians are playing chess, capital is harvesting, and we can only go with the flow.
The Federal Reserve's policies are the real decisive factor. All the fluctuations in Bitcoin are just a backdrop.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 01-04 15:54
Wow, I need to ponder this logic carefully. The strong dollar killing risk assets has always seemed a bit far-fetched to me.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-04 15:52
I'm tired of the logic that a strong dollar kills risk assets. The question is, will the Federal Reserve really cause a hard landing?
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-04 15:51
Wow, precise strikes vs money printing battle, this logic hits the core... A strong dollar really is a nightmare for BTC.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-04 15:51
That's right, precise strikes are indeed more cost-effective than traditional warfare, but this logic hits a bit close to home for BTC... Strong dollar + low inflation, once they appear, no risk asset can escape.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 01-04 15:49
A strong dollar kills valuations, I've already calculated this logic... The key still depends on how the Federal Reserve plays it. Short-term volatility is unavoidable. My BTC is still distributed across multi-signature wallets, with private keys managed in shards. I'll act after this wave of adjustment passes.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-04 15:40
So, once the geopolitical card is played, BTC has to follow the dance... The Federal Reserve's move is absolutely brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 01-04 15:37
Wow, this logical chain is really incredible... As soon as the strong dollar comes in, Bitcoin has to kneel; geopolitics is basically just a Wall Street chip game.
Many people only see the surface excitement of geopolitical conflicts, but Wall Street focuses on the numbers. Especially at this moment, understanding the economic logic behind U.S. foreign policy is actually understanding the capital markets — and thereby understanding the next move of Bitcoin.
The most straightforward example: Why do capital markets prefer "precision strikes" over traditional warfare? Both involve conflict on the surface, but the economic implications are completely different.
**Huge Differences in Cost Structure**
What does traditional warfare (taking Iraq as an example) entail? Trillions of dollars in fiscal deficits. Where does this money come from? Printing money. Once the Federal Reserve initiates quantitative easing, inflation soars, and the dollar depreciates. This is a double whammy for U.S. stocks and bonds, while boosting gold and safe-haven assets.
But precision strikes are different. The cost might only be tens of millions of dollars, almost no pressure on the U.S. fiscal budget. What is the market’s reaction? It sees the efficient operation of U.S. power and the reinforcement of dollar hegemony. At this point, the dollar index strengthens, U.S. Treasury yields rise, and investors sell off gold and safe assets, shifting to the dollar and U.S. stocks.
What about Bitcoin? In a strong dollar environment, risk assets come under pressure. This is the basic logic.
**Long-term Significance of Restructuring the Energy Supply Chain**
But this is not the deepest logic. The most critical factor is energy.
Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but these oil flows are now blocked. Why? Sanctions. The current regime is sanctioned by major Western countries, causing Venezuela, a major supplier, to be absent from the global oil market.
If the situation changes and a pro-Western new regime comes to power and sanctions are lifted, what will happen? Global oil supply will suddenly increase, putting pressure on crude oil prices. Inflation expectations will decline, and the dollar will strengthen further. Looking at risk assets linked to inflation — including Bitcoin — they will also face adjustment pressures.
**Short-term vs. Long-term Market Pricing**
How will the markets react this year? There may be some volatility in the short term, but once this "strong dollar + low inflation expectations" pattern is established, risk assets may generally enter a correction phase. Gold will be suppressed, and Bitcoin will find it hard to remain unaffected.
In the long run, everything depends on the Federal Reserve’s policy path. But for now, geopolitics is essentially signaling price signals to the capital markets.