Since this incident erupted, the situation within the rights protection group has been quite complex. There are indeed users who have suffered real losses and are voicing their demands, but at the same time, many opportunistic voices have also mixed in, making it difficult to distinguish completely.

The clearest sign is the highly uniform public opinion—consistent posts and a flood of comments appearing in quick succession, with a very tight rhythm. Behind this phenomenon, it’s obvious that someone is orchestrating and amplifying certain voices.

What’s more ironic is that a major exchange initially chose to cut losses and take responsibility proactively, hoping to resolve the conflict. Instead, it became the most heavily attacked target. Meanwhile, other platforms’ more aggressive actions did not attract such widespread criticism. This stark contrast is indeed quite intriguing.