Small investors start from 50,000 and grow to 300,000. Many people think it's due to insider information or exceptional talent, but ultimately it's about a trading system that can be executed consistently. Compared to operating based on intuition, true stable growth relies on these few disciplines—



Divide the principal into five equal parts, each operated independently. For example, with 10,000, split into five units of 2,000 each, never go all-in at once. Historically, those who went all-in on a single shot often ended up with their results reflected clearly in their accounts.

Enter at the current market price for the first order, and don't always try to catch the bottom. Steadily establish a basic position and follow the market rhythm. Then, it's simple—take profits when it rises 10%, and when it drops 10%, continue to add to reduce the average cost. Repeat this cycle until all five parts are used up or the position is fully closed.

Sounds too simple? But this is the core logic: buy more when it dips, sell when it rises. For example, with 100,000, operate with 20,000 per trade. Each batch profits 2,000, which is much more satisfying than analyzing K-line charts all day.

The only bottleneck is that 10% fluctuations don't happen every day. What about idle funds? Let them sit? That would lead to losses. Instead, allocate the idle portion into some stable products for appreciation, and re-engage when volatility returns. Earn interest while waiting—this is the power of compound growth.

To put it plainly, this isn't about betting on the market direction, but about turning uncertain market fluctuations into certain, staged gains. Traders who grow from 50,000 to several million rely on this straightforward logic—the systematic, staged approach is better than single large bets each time.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 01-07 13:07
It sounds good, but how many people can truly stick to this system? Splitting into five parts sounds simple, but a 20% drop makes you start doubting life. This logic is compound interest, the key is to endure, brother. A 10% fluctuation really can't be waited for; most of the time, you're just earning that little interest. Those who go all-in have all lost their money; there's no way to argue with that. It sounds so real, I just want to ask, who among retail investors can really do it? I've tried the method of averaging down in batches, but it's easy to end up digging a deeper hole. The psychology of bottom-fishing is too strong; entering at the current price is really hard to do. That's what they say, but in practice, mindset is the biggest enemy. I've heard this system too many times; the key is still to have patience.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPullvip
· 01-07 05:20
It sounds good, but the key is to have money in hand, not be in a hurry, and be able to withstand the pullback. Splitting into batches is indeed foolproof; I'm just worried about emotional decision-making during execution. If it drops 10%, continue to buy? It depends on what is dropping; buying the top-gaining coins usually just makes you the bag holder. Wait, isn't this just dollar-cost averaging? Why make it so complicated? The five-part system sounds scientific, but in reality, volatility isn't that regular, and it also depends on what you choose. The real difficulty isn't the strategy; it's having the discipline to stay calm and operate when the account drops 50%. Anyone can tell the story of compound interest, but the key is when the 10% volatility will come and whether you can wait for it—that's the trap.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChainvip
· 01-04 14:48
Really, the key is to stick to it and not go all in. Most people die from greed. I've tried this 5-part phased approach, but it really tests your mentality. Waiting for a 10% fluctuation is truly tough; investing idle funds in stable products to earn interest is a good idea. That said, growing from 50,000 to 300,000 is still okay. Not claiming a hundredfold return makes it more realistic. Dipping in phases to lower the average cost is a well-known tactic but effective. It all depends on who can really follow through. The guy who was fully invested and suffered a huge loss deserves it; greed comes with its price.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 01-04 14:47
Splitting into five parts is indeed a tough move; the biggest obstacle is always execution.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomniavip
· 01-04 14:35
It sounds great, but the question is, how many can stick to the end?
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 01-04 14:31
Honestly, the batch system doesn't sound sexy, but it really can help you live the longest. I've known this logic for a long time, but I just can't execute it. Sell when it rises 10%? I always want to get a couple more daily limit hits. Where are those who go all-in now? A reliable system > researching market trends every day, this really hit me. Allocating idle funds into stable products, I hadn't thought of this before. Diversifying risk is tiredly discussed, but this time it seems to be something real. From 50,000 to 300,000 sounds easy, but 99% of people still get stuck in their mindset.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 01-04 14:26
It seems very rational, but I think 99% of retail investors can't execute it. The real bottleneck isn't the system, but psychology.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)