The ripples in the teacup are still trembling, and the ETH price has settled at 3165.99. Fireworks exploded instantly in three trading groups, and those novice traders who hesitated five minutes ago started shouting, "Hold steady at 3200, aiming for 3500." I closed all chat windows and switched to the on-chain monitoring interface—the alert system flashing with glaring orange warnings, and the abnormal operation graph of sixteen related addresses unfolding on the screen like an invisible hunting net.
Most people focus on the market chart, only seeing the rise and fall of candlesticks and indicator changes. But through the perspective of the on-chain alert system, I see another story: at the moment ETH touched 3165, three textbook-level classic operations occurred simultaneously on the chain— a market maker placed limit sell orders in the 3120-3150 range across five exchanges, and three large addresses transferred ETH worth $47 million through cross-chain bridges to derivatives protocols. Most interestingly, all these operations avoided regular monitoring periods and were quietly completed during Asian traders' lunch breaks.
The confrontation between technical illusions and on-chain truths often determines the outcome in an instant. When you're tangled up before the 15-minute MACD divergence, the on-chain data has already completed a full dissection of this "false breakout." In the 47 minutes before the price surged, a series of details ignored by traditional analysis were fully recorded—this is the power of data monitoring. The virtual and real aspects of the market are laid bare on the chain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTHoarder
· 01-07 13:27
It's the same old on-chain monitoring routine, acting like you can see through everything. I just want to ask, if you really see a false breakout, why don't you just call the trades directly?
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 01-07 13:27
It's another classic case of the market maker taking a lunch break to dump, I'm really speechless. On-chain data definitely doesn't lie, but the problem is—most people can't understand these alerts at all and are still shouting 3500[Dog Head]
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 01-07 06:56
On-chain data is the real truth; candlestick charts are all illusions. This move is truly exceptional.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-04 23:02
On-chain data doesn't lie, but traders do. The actions during lunch break were really impressive; no one was watching at all.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 01-04 13:49
On-chain data breakdown and breakthrough, this move is brilliant... Beginners are still shouting 3500, while whales have already quietly run away.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 01-04 13:49
On-chain data reveals the truth; candlestick charts are just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 01-04 13:44
On-chain data doesn't lie, but the bragging in trading groups does.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 01-04 13:42
It's the same old trick; a seasoned veteran sees through it at a glance.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 01-04 13:41
On-chain data is the truth, candlestick charts are just illusions.
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteran
· 01-04 13:39
Oh no, it's the same old "on-chain transparency" story. I, as an experienced trader, fell for this trap back in the day.
In 2018, I also saw similar warning systems, but it still ended the same way—getting wrecked. Wake up, everyone. Big players have never stopped manipulating the market.
The ripples in the teacup are still trembling, and the ETH price has settled at 3165.99. Fireworks exploded instantly in three trading groups, and those novice traders who hesitated five minutes ago started shouting, "Hold steady at 3200, aiming for 3500." I closed all chat windows and switched to the on-chain monitoring interface—the alert system flashing with glaring orange warnings, and the abnormal operation graph of sixteen related addresses unfolding on the screen like an invisible hunting net.
Most people focus on the market chart, only seeing the rise and fall of candlesticks and indicator changes. But through the perspective of the on-chain alert system, I see another story: at the moment ETH touched 3165, three textbook-level classic operations occurred simultaneously on the chain— a market maker placed limit sell orders in the 3120-3150 range across five exchanges, and three large addresses transferred ETH worth $47 million through cross-chain bridges to derivatives protocols. Most interestingly, all these operations avoided regular monitoring periods and were quietly completed during Asian traders' lunch breaks.
The confrontation between technical illusions and on-chain truths often determines the outcome in an instant. When you're tangled up before the 15-minute MACD divergence, the on-chain data has already completed a full dissection of this "false breakout." In the 47 minutes before the price surged, a series of details ignored by traditional analysis were fully recorded—this is the power of data monitoring. The virtual and real aspects of the market are laid bare on the chain.