In the recent Federal Reserve meeting, there was a clear divergence of opinions within the policy circle. After announcing a 25 basis point cut in the federal funds rate on December 10th, the number of dissenters reached a recent high, reflecting differing views on balancing inflation and employment. To stabilize the market, the Fed also injected $74.6 billion in short-term liquidity through the standing repo facility.
Interestingly, these measures did not have an obvious direct impact on the crypto market. Bitcoin's price remains stable around $90,000, demonstrating considerable resilience.
There is also a noteworthy detail behind the scenes: the U.S. government currently holds $30.7 billion in crypto assets, primarily Bitcoin and Ethereum. These assets have appreciated with the market rally, which theoretically benefits the government's financial position. However, due to legal framework restrictions, official management of these assets remains cautious, favoring long-term, prudent holding rather than active trading. This stance, to some extent, also reflects the subtle changes in the status of crypto assets within the traditional financial system.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotFinancialAdvice
· 22h ago
The Fed's internal conflicts are like this, and BTC still stays steady at 90,000. Now that's real resilience under pressure.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 22h ago
The Fed is already arguing internally, and they still have to rely on repurchase agreements to stabilize the market. These days are a bit uncertain.
BTC is still firmly pegged at 90,000, which is really resilient—unlike my heart.
Speaking of the government’s 30.7 billion assets... not trading, just holding. Is this cowardice or smart? It feels a bit awkward.
Wait, even US officials are starting to hold coins, what are we retail investors still hesitating for?
The rate cut, Bitcoin actually doesn’t care much about it. What does that mean? It means traditional finance has probably been sidelined.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 22h ago
The Federal Reserve has been messing around for a while, but BTC remains as steady as a rock... This resilience score deserves a 9. By the way, regarding the $30.7 billion US government holdings, it's really subtle—holding without trading. I need to ponder this operational logic. Could it actually be paving the way for some kind of institutional design?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 22h ago
The Federal Reserve keeps messing around here and there, but BTC remains quite stable. That's unbelievable.
The US government holding 30.7 billion in coins? With this move, they really leave retail investors in the dust.
Dispute hitting a new high? Honestly, no one can figure out what to do. If they mess up, the crypto market will have to take the blame.
That 74.6 billion liquidity injection feels like a psychological game with the market.
The Fed's "cautious holding" attitude implicitly acknowledges it, even if they don't say it outright.
Long-term holding is the way to go. Those who watch the market every day should really learn from how the government operates.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 22h ago
The Federal Reserve has started infighting again, and this time the number of dissenters has hit a new high. But what I care more about is whether the $90,000 BTC is really so resistant to drops; it feels a bit unbelievable...
---
$30.7 billion in crypto assets are gathering dust in the hands of the US government. I just want to know when these people will truly figure it out.
---
Interest rate cuts and liquidity injections—despite this combination, BTC remains unmoved, indicating that mainstream institutions have long since made their stance clear; it's no surprise.
---
The government holding coins without trading sounds cautious, but it's actually an admission that crypto assets are already integrated into the system.
---
$74.6 billion poured in to stabilize the market, but it turns out BTC's resilience is more practical—just thinking about it is ironic.
---
What does it mean when internal dissent increases? It indicates that expectations for inflation and employment are completely out of sync; crypto has instead become a safe haven.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 22h ago
Federal Reserve internal conflicts, but the crypto world remains as steady as a rock—this logic is pretty solid.
---
$30.7 billion just sitting there, the government is probably waiting for us to take over.
---
In plain terms, traditional finance can't shake BTC no matter how much they fuss—this is the real resilient asset.
---
Is the number of dissenters hitting a new high? Ha, they're just putting on a show; in the end, it'll be rate cuts again. Optimistic about crypto.
---
Dollar devaluation + increased government holdings—under this combination, BTC breaking $100,000 is a sure thing.
In the recent Federal Reserve meeting, there was a clear divergence of opinions within the policy circle. After announcing a 25 basis point cut in the federal funds rate on December 10th, the number of dissenters reached a recent high, reflecting differing views on balancing inflation and employment. To stabilize the market, the Fed also injected $74.6 billion in short-term liquidity through the standing repo facility.
Interestingly, these measures did not have an obvious direct impact on the crypto market. Bitcoin's price remains stable around $90,000, demonstrating considerable resilience.
There is also a noteworthy detail behind the scenes: the U.S. government currently holds $30.7 billion in crypto assets, primarily Bitcoin and Ethereum. These assets have appreciated with the market rally, which theoretically benefits the government's financial position. However, due to legal framework restrictions, official management of these assets remains cautious, favoring long-term, prudent holding rather than active trading. This stance, to some extent, also reflects the subtle changes in the status of crypto assets within the traditional financial system.