2026-01-04 13:21:27

I've also stepped into quite a few pits. I used to watch the charts every day, obsessed with various technical analysis theories, thinking I was a professional, but in the end, I blew up my account three times, and it kept getting smaller.

It wasn't until later that I realized what truly changed me wasn't more advanced skills, but completely abandoning those complicated routines. Instead, I adopted the "dumbest" approach in the crypto world—so what happened? My account grew from $1,700 to $130,000 step by step.

Actually, the method isn't complicated. Summarized, there are only three points, but the key is to strictly follow them.

**First Principle: Only chase strength.** Don't guess whether it's a shakeout or a trap, and don't study those complex psychological battles. I only look at one thing—whether the price has truly broken the previous high. If it breaks through, I follow; if it fails, I withdraw immediately, no delays. The goal is to profit from the trend, not to gamble on future directions.

**Second Principle: Always control your position size.** Use at most 20% of your funds for each trade. Once you reach your target, gradually reduce your position. If your stop-loss is triggered, exit decisively—no adding to the position, no holding through losses, and definitely no emotional counter-trades. Staying alive is the top priority; doubling your money is just a bonus.

**Third Principle: Follow the big trend.** During an uptrend, only go long; during a downtrend, look for short opportunities. No predictions, no waiting for reversals—just follow the most certain direction at the moment to earn the profits of that phase.

Others might trade ten times a day, but I might only make one or two trades a week. But you know what? My account is actually becoming more stable.

It's not because I'm particularly skilled, but because I finally stopped fighting the market. The truth about crypto trading is: those who really make money are often not the ones with the strongest analysis skills, but the ones who can stick to simple discipline until the end.

What you truly lack might not be more techniques, but execution and patience. Stop overthinking those fancy tricks. Stick to this simple method for a month and see—you might overturn your understanding of trading.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-07 10:43

Damn, this is my blood, sweat, and tears story. The three liquidation experiences really hit me. You're so right. I study head and shoulders patterns, triangles, and consolidations every day, but I ended up losing everything. Now, I just need to go all in. Is it true that from 1700 to 130,000? No more hype, just try going all in and see what happens. Simple and brutal might actually win? I don't buy that. Using 20% of your position is a killer move, much more rational than my previous all-in approach. It sounds very convincing, but when it comes to actually executing, I still want to add to my position. Do you understand that feeling? If this method worked within a month, I’d just give up and eat chicken. I don’t believe in fate.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainMessenger

· 01-06 16:25

It's too late to wake up; I've been fooled by technical analysis many times. This is what I've always wanted to say: discipline is the key, not some advanced tricks. From 1700 to 130,000, that's real steady growth, unlike those who boast about doubling every day. Wait, does it really only take a month to see the difference? That sounds too idealistic. I'm going to try this method now—strictly follow the stop-loss rules and see how long I can hold on. You're right, one or two trades a week are much more reliable than ten or more trades a day. This logic makes sense; survival is truly the first priority in trading.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-bd883c58

· 01-06 04:08

That's so true. I used to stare at candlestick charts every day until my eyes hurt, stacking various indicators like a layered cake, but I still ended up losing money. Now, like you, I survive by using simple methods instead. It's outrageous—complex things tend to ruin people, while simple discipline is the real key. The part about three margin calls really hit home; it felt like I was hearing my own story, it’s so similar. But honestly, knowing these principles and actually being able to implement them are two different things. Most people probably can't resist the temptation. I think I should try this approach. Trading once or twice a week sounds much more comfortable, without being battered by the market every day.

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 01-04 13:51

That's so true. I used to watch K-line charts every day, but the more I watched, the more I lost. Now I just hold 20% of my position and follow the trend when it comes. I feel much more relaxed. Execution really is a hundred times more important than skills. Now I only trade twice a week and make more money than I used to making ten trades a day. This method sounds silly, but it works. After a month of trying, I finally found that my account is no longer crashing. Stop doing so many fancy tricks. Only these three rules can make people money. Most people are still trying to figure out how to wash the盘诱多. From 1700 to 130,000, it shows that discipline can truly change everything. The key is patience. Most people give up within a week. Now I only watch one thing: whether it breaks through or not. I ignore everything else. That's why big players make money and are so relaxed—they don't need to mess around every day.

View OriginalReply0

UncleLiquidation

· 01-04 13:51

That's right, that's the point. I used to watch K-line charts every day, but it was all self-deception. Now I simplify — only chase breakouts, strictly cut losses, two or three trades a week are enough. Really, execution > analysis, this hits home. Ah, stop messing around. I've tried it, and these three points are the most useful. No stop-loss set, account gets wiped out, sooner or later. Compared to those complicated indicators, I now trust the trend more. Simple and straightforward is truly effective. What’s the use of doubling your money if you’re not alive to enjoy it? Two wins a week beat ten a day — this is what I believe in.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 01-04 13:49

I've heard this logic many times, but few people can really stick to it. That's right, it's a matter of execution. I used to study candlestick charts every day, thinking I had discovered some kind of secret, but the outcome was always the same. From 1700 to 130,000, this number is indeed convincing, but what about the cycle? I'm most unsure about stop-loss decisions; I always want to hold on and see what happens. The logic is clear, but when it comes to actually biting the bullet and executing, the mindset collapses. Compared to technical analysis, what this guy says—"not fighting the market"—is the real core. That's why some people make money while others lose, ultimately it's about discipline. One or two trades a week sounds easy, but it really requires a lot of patience.

View OriginalReply0

GasGrillMaster

· 01-04 13:45

Really, making one or two trades a week with a single shot is more stable, I believe in this approach. From 1700 to 130,000, what does that mean? It means less action, fewer mistakes. Once you see through it, it's that simple; execution is the real hell. What happened to those guys making a dozen or more trades a day? I hardly see anyone making a profit. The phrase "not fighting the market" is brilliant; so many people die because of their own cleverness.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHuntress

· 01-04 13:26

$1,700 to $130,000? Data shows that this logic is indeed feasible, but the key still depends on whether it can be truly implemented effectively. Most people get stopped by emotional trading. --- That's right, historical data shows that those who control their position sizes tend to survive the longest. I've seen too many accounts wiped out in one go due to greed. --- I agree with only chasing the strong. Not guessing the bottom can indeed help avoid many pitfalls. But the question is—does this method really work in a volatile market? --- The key phrase is "strict execution." Anyone can understand these three principles when broken down, but very few can stick to them for a month without losing their composure, to be honest. --- Turning $1,700 into $130,000 is a growth multiple worth paying attention to. But the prerequisite is having enough capital and a sufficiently long time window; not all accounts can replicate this. --- Another "simple discipline theory," but I feel the real difficulty isn't in the method itself, but in psychological resilience and risk tolerance. No matter how advanced the technique, it still gets stopped by human nature. --- Being decisive with stop-losses is no problem. I'm just worried that some people talk beautifully but when it comes to critical moments, they start "holding the position." Execution ability is truly the most scarce.

View OriginalReply0