2026-01-04 10:24:21

Dig deep enough into the mainstream coverage and you'll spot something curious. Major outlets publish sweeping claims about market integrity while burying contradictory details in the fine print. This pattern—asserting one thing prominently, then quietly acknowledging the opposite deeper in—raises questions about how information gets framed for public consumption. Whether intentional or just sloppy editing, these inconsistencies matter when they shape market narratives and investor decisions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanPrince

· 01-07 09:21

I've seen this trick many times. The main headline sounds really good, but then they sneak in the details... Truly clever.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 01-04 10:53

The title says one thing and does another, with all the details being sarcastic—that's the daily routine of mainstream media.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 01-04 10:49

The headline is truly gripping, with sharp edges in every detail... I'm already tired of the mainstream media's "say one thing and do another" approach.

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 01-04 10:40

嗯...又是这一套？标题唱赞歌细节挖坑，我早就麻了

Reply0

ser_we_are_early

· 01-04 10:29

Hmm... One set of headlines with different details, this trick has been played out in the crypto world long ago --- Basically, it's just a scam to deceive retail investors. The headlines are misleading, and investors have to dig their own pits --- Really, every time I see this kind of news I find it funny. They talk about market integrity seriously but... never mind --- The truth is in the details. Mainstream media's approach is truly brilliant --- Highlight something and subtly deny it? Isn't this Schrödinger's market? Haha --- Wait, is this intentional or just an oversight? If intentional, that's outrageous --- So now if you want to know the truth, you have to read all news backwards, right? Information these days is too surreal --- If it affects investors' decisions, that's no small matter. Someone needs to come out and clarify --- The more contradictions, the more I feel there's something behind it. You have to dig yourself

View OriginalReply0