2026-01-03 20:25:41

What is the real bottleneck in current AI training? Many focus on the compute race, but there is a different perspective worth considering — high-quality human-annotated data is the key.

The idea behind Perceptron Network is very interesting: instead of making data producers play a behind-the-scenes role, let them become the core of the ecosystem. What does this mean? Participants gain true ownership, clear recognition of their contributions, and visible economic returns.

Compared to traditional black-box data collection processes, this transparent, incentive-aligned model breaks down information asymmetry. Human annotators are no longer passive cost centers but active participants with vested interests. When combined with data quality tools like Mindo AI, the overall efficiency and credibility of the ecosystem are expected to improve.

This may represent a new direction for the integration of Web3 and AI: from data production to model training, the entire chain can be redesigned to be more fair and efficient.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMisery

· 01-06 02:11

Are data annotators finally going to turn things around? I buy into this logic... Instead of burning computational power, it's better to give the money to the people actually doing the work. Anyone can see which approach is more sustainable.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 01-05 02:33

Data annotators are finally getting a chance to turn things around. Those big companies before were really ruthless, paying them pitifully little and treating them like tools. The Perceptron Network incentive model looks good on paper, but the key is whether anyone actually participates. The breakthrough still depends on token distribution and liquidity; otherwise, it's just a new bottle with old wine. Web3+AI really needs to be done this way, or data will always be controlled by a few. By the way, Mindo AI's data quality tools need to be reliable, or no matter how many incentives there are, good results won't come out. It feels like this is the truly innovative direction—more rational than just competing over computing power. But it still depends on how the implementation turns out; papers look good, but execution is difficult.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentSage

· 01-03 20:55

The narrative of the computing power competition has long been outdated; data is the real trump card. Annotators finally no longer need to be exploited, this is the right way. The Perceptron approach is awesome; aligned incentives are the key. The black box process should die; transparency is inevitable. Web3 + AI is finally becoming interesting. Are annotators earning benefits? Then participation can double. Breaking information asymmetry will cause ecosystem efficiency to explode. Tools like Mindo combined with incentive mechanisms are indeed perfect. Honestly, data ownership is too important for annotators. Another track where ordinary people can participate.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHobo

· 01-03 20:54

I've said it before, computing power is not the bottleneck at all; data is the key. Unfortunately, most people are still competing over GPUs... This approach is indeed different—truly benefiting annotators? It sounds like someone has finally remembered the value of data. The Web3 + AI combination feels just right—transparent, aligned incentives, brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichVictim

· 01-03 20:51

Are data annotators finally going to turn the tables? Instead of spending money to buy computing power, incentivizing people to participate actively is indeed smarter... This is what Web3 should be doing.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 01-03 20:44

I'm already tired of the computing power competition; data is the real game-changer. The Perceptron approach has finally clicked, and annotation workers can finally get a share. The Web3+AI path is indeed wild. Decentralized data markets are definitely the future, and the black-box collection methods will eventually be shattered. This time, there's no need to work for giants for free value, it's a rare opportunity.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 01-03 20:34

Hey, finally someone is getting to the point. Data annotation workers have been exploited for so many years, are they finally getting a chance to turn things around? The compute power race is long outdated; the real bottleneck is data quality. But who cares about the lives of annotators... until Web3 came along. Transparent incentives sound good in theory, but can they really be implemented? I remain skeptical. I get the logic of the Perceptron approach—participants have skin in the game, so data quality naturally improves. That’s the long-term play. The black-box collection mode should go bankrupt; information asymmetry has exploited so many people.

View OriginalReply0