Anyone considering Luminex on the bridge? Think twice. The team ran off with funds that users bridged through their cross-chain bridge. Multiple reports of missing assets and no response from the dev team. This is exactly why you need to be cautious with new bridge solutions—test with small amounts first and always verify the legitimacy of the protocol before moving significant capital across chains.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTears
· 6h ago
Another one has run away? Oh my god, these days even bridges are unsafe...
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 6h ago
This broken bridge is really outrageous, just another old trick.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGod
· 6h ago
Is it running away again? Damn, this circle is really rotten to the core.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 6h ago
Running away is really a nightmare for the bridge ecosystem. Let me check the data—what's the current on-chain footprint of Luminex? Has anyone uncovered the contract source code?
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 6h ago
Another exit scam project, Luminex is really incredible this time. The saying about small-scale trial and error is not wrong, but to be honest, most people just can't control themselves; the cost of greed is too high.
Anyone considering Luminex on the bridge? Think twice. The team ran off with funds that users bridged through their cross-chain bridge. Multiple reports of missing assets and no response from the dev team. This is exactly why you need to be cautious with new bridge solutions—test with small amounts first and always verify the legitimacy of the protocol before moving significant capital across chains.