2026-01-02 10:25:19

Recently, the market has shown some signs of recovery, which is indeed a good signal. However, what truly stands out is that some projects are working on a major initiative—not just patching up AI systems, but fundamentally reshaping the underlying trust mechanisms.

The question is: the more powerful the model, the more ambiguous the decision-making process becomes, and the harder it is to define responsibility boundaries. The public has long lost trust. Residents in Chicago have even taken direct action, demanding that before street robots go online, the entire decision-making chain must be made transparent and open—this logic is actually quite clear: if you're going to use AI, I need to see how it thinks.

This is what Web3 should be doing.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 1h ago

Transparency is indeed a pain point; the move in Chicago was a bit harsh. Black-box AI should have been exposed long ago; Web3 is just the right solution to fill this gap. Unclear responsibility chains make everyone hesitant to touch it—that's the real problem. How can we truly put the decision-making process on the blockchain? Just thinking about it is complicated. Decentralized transparency mechanisms are more valuable than any marketing pitch.

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 5h ago

Transparency definitely needs to be stepped up; who the hell wants to be controlled by a black box decision-making process? No matter how powerful AI is, if I can't see the underlying logic, it's useless. The folks in Chicago are onto something. Web3 must seize this opportunity; don't turn it into another scheme to harvest retail investors. The chain of responsibility must be laid out clearly; otherwise, it's just a rebrand to continue the same old scam.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 10h ago

Transparency is indeed the key; AI black boxes can't go on like this. On-chain governance + verifiable computation, this is the breakthrough. That move in Chicago was really clever, forcing project teams to come clean. Wait, can our Web3 really do better than traditional internet... I'm a bit skeptical. I'm just worried it will end up being the same old wine in a new bottle.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 10h ago

Finally someone has explained it thoroughly. The black-box AI approach should have been abandoned long ago. That's right, transparency > performance. Web3 should adopt this approach. The folks in Chicago are really smart, forcing the robots to reveal all decisions—awesome. The blurred responsibility boundaries are really upsetting; now no one dares to trust anymore. The smarter AI gets, the more people fear it. Ultimately, it's still about lacking trust. But speaking of which, how many projects can truly achieve complete transparency? Most are just bragging. Redefining trust at the core? I like this idea; it's much better than patching things up.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 10h ago

Basically, it's just that there are too many AI black boxes, and no one wants to be backstabbed by algorithms. I think the Chicago move is the real enlightenment; transparency is indeed more important than anything else. Wait, can Web3 really do this? Or is it just another new concept attracting new retail investors. Isn't it true that rebuilding trust at the core is 100 times more important than patching up issues. The decision-making power of black box models definitely needs some constraints. Making AI decision chains transparent seems to be the true necessity for the future.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagrant

· 10h ago

Ha, that group in Chicago has finally woken up. The AI black box definitely needs to be smashed and restarted. That's why I've always believed in on-chain governance. Transparency must be embedded in the code. Finally, someone understands that patching and fixing won't solve the trust crisis at all.

View OriginalReply0

0xDreamChaser

· 10h ago

At the end of the day, it's a transparency issue. Who dares to use a black-box model? On-chain auditing is better than anything else. That move in Chicago was awesome; it has to be done like that. Accountability + transparency—that's real innovation. If fuzzy decision-making is used in finance, it's doomed. Web3 is just doing the opposite. I think the key is to have a traceability mechanism. No matter how powerful AI is, if it's not transparent, it's just being rogue.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 10h ago

Transparency is really the core; just optimizing the model isn't enough. The black box needs to be made transparent. The stuff those folks in Chicago came up with, our community needs to think it over. Honestly, putting the AI decision chain on the blockchain is the way to go, right? Who dares to use a black box AI? It's better to go back to the original logic—rules are transparent, and the process is traceable. Trust mechanisms are more valuable than any performance metrics.

View OriginalReply0