Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Creating chart analysis, in simple terms, is a set of geometric logic. To truly understand it, you need to start from the most basic definitions—this may sound like old advice, but it’s actually the most practical in real trading. No matter how complex the trend, returning to fundamental definitions reveals that it’s not so mysterious after all.
The most common stumbling block in pattern analysis is simply the containment relationship between candlesticks. But as long as you understand geometric thinking, some inferences will naturally come to light:
First, use [di, gi] to mark the interval formed by the lowest and highest prices of the i-th candlestick. When breaking upward, a sequence of n consecutive candlesticks with containment relationships is equivalent to the single candlestick corresponding to the interval [maxdi, maxgi]. In other words, these n candlesticks and the candlestick that contains both their highest and lowest points are essentially the same. The downward trend is the reverse, corresponding to the interval [mindi, mingi].
Second, the associative law is the foundation of Chanlun. The analysis of candlestick containment relationships must also follow this law. But here’s a pitfall: containment relationships do not satisfy the transitive law. If candlestick 1 and 2 contain each other, and candlestick 2 and 3 contain each other, it does not mean candlestick 1 and 3 contain each other. Therefore, analysis must be done in sequence: first, determine the containment relationship between candlesticks 1 and 2 to generate a new candlestick; then compare this new candlestick with candlestick 3—if they contain each other, continue combining; if not, treat the new candlestick as a normal candlestick.
Third, what does "upward," "downward," etc., really mean? This is the key to truly understanding the trend.
---
I've stepped on the trap of the transmission law before. In steps 1 and 2, there's containment; in steps 2 and 3, there's also containment. As a result, I thought 1 and 3 must have it... Wake up, that's not how it works.
---
Honestly, the most popular statement is that basic definitions are truly valuable. Only during actual trading and backtesting do you realize this.
---
The definitions of upward and downward are the real ceiling; it's pointless to understand them without clarity.
---
That set of [maxdi, maxgi]... Ah, so that's compressing n candlesticks into one. No wonder the trend is so captivating.
---
The law of combination is fine, but the transmission law fails. This logic in the Chen theory design is quite brilliant.
---
It sounds good, but in actual trading, you still rely on market feel... But it’s indeed reasonable.
Regarding the inclusion relationship, I used to be stuck on this before. Looking back now, I realize that simply memorizing formulas is useless; you need to thoroughly understand that way of thinking.
Wait, the fact that the transitive law doesn't always hold is interesting. Does that mean we can't infer things arbitrarily? We need to proceed step by step, right?