2026-01-02 03:23:23

Recent project developments worth paying attention to. BTC-related tokens are currently stable at a level of 8 zeros plus 3, while the corresponding U-backed liquidity pool reserves have reached $670,000, indicating sufficient overall liquidity. Some earnings from market-making addresses have not yet been settled, which shows that the project is gradually optimizing fund management.

Interestingly, participating in the MiniVerse ecosystem construction doesn't have to be driven by token price movements. Once you understand the underlying logic of MiniBTC's operation, you can grasp the robustness of the entire mechanism—at that point, confidence, security, and motivation to participate naturally reach their peak. This sense of solidity doesn't come from short-term profit expectations but from a deep understanding of the project itself.

BTC0,12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlAndChill

· 01-04 22:52

670,000 U Pool is indeed substantial, but let's not just focus on the numbers; we need to see if the underlying logic holds up. --- I love hearing "not being hostage to the coin price." Only by truly understanding the mechanism can you sleep soundly. --- Is the market-making profit still being settled? It depends on the rhythm; otherwise, it feels a bit uncertain. --- A sense of stability sounds good, but I’m afraid it might just be an illusion. --- 8 zeros plus 3? The recent price performance is okay; the main thing is whether the subsequent liquidity can hold up. --- To put it simply, we still need to delve into how MiniBTC operates; otherwise, even the most solid reasons are just clouds. --- A 670,000 pool sounds good, but everyone talks about optimizing fund management. The key is in the execution.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 01-04 06:58

Ha, another story of "deep understanding." I've seen too many, and in the end, they all turn into deep losses. A pool of 670,000 USDT sounds quite sufficient, but the yield from the market-making address hasn't been settled yet? Isn't that just slow capital flow? Not to mention anything else, I just want to ask, do those people who "clarify the underlying logic" also feel particularly confident when the coin price drops? I think I heard this line "not being led by the coin price" during the last bull market. But what happened, everyone? When the bear market came, they all had to kneel. But to be fair, the 670,000 pool is indeed much more honest than some zeroed-out projects. Still, talking about "a sense of stability" at this moment seems a bit awkward.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-03 14:16

670,000 pools sound impressive, but upon closer inspection, it's still just a bunch of data games.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropF5Bro

· 01-02 03:53

670,000 U Pool is okay, but when will the market-making profits be settled?

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 01-02 03:53

The U pool of 670,000 USD looks okay, but I just want to know when those unsettled market-making profits will be paid out.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-02 03:50

670,000 U Pool? You need to check the access control carefully—who can operate and withdraw, and whether there is a timelock protection—don't fall into the trap where a certain address just says "withdraw" and it happens.

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker