2026-01-02 00:21:06

AIBT is exploring an interesting direction—using AI and blockchain to redesign decentralized legal agreements and arbitration processes.

From a technical perspective, AI handles natural language contract terms, quickly identifying potential performance risk points, and can provide relatively fair arbitration suggestions based on big data analysis in case of disputes. Blockchain fully codifies the contract logic, automatically executing once conditions are met, with funds locked in and tamper-proof. This "code is law" approach offers particularly high transparency.

The benefits are obvious—significantly reducing legal enforcement costs and minimizing opportunities for human manipulation. There's no need to wait for traditional arbitration institutions' rulings, nor worry about intermediaries causing trouble. The contract speaks for itself, data is recorded, and no one can alter it.

If this model can truly be implemented, it will have a substantial impact on contract performance and dispute resolution.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeWithAPlan

· 10h ago

Code is law sounds great, but when it comes to actual enforcement, who is responsible if AI makes a mistake?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-2fce706c

· 10h ago

I've been talking about this direction for three years, and only now seeing AIBT's moves, which shows the trend is really here. Those who entered early have already set up their positions; don't still be hesitating.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMaskedRider

· 10h ago

Code is law sounds great, but what if there's a bug?

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 10h ago

Code is the law, it sounds great, but what if AI makes a mistake? Black box arbitration is even more terrifying, right?

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 10h ago

ngl the "code is law" angle sounds clean on paper but you're glossing over the actual execution costs here... empirically speaking, who's paying for all those ai inference calls on-chain? that's *demonstrably* not gas-efficient if you're doing nlp processing in smart contracts tbh

Reply0

rugged_again

· 10h ago

Changing the code feels pretty good, but the problem is, could the person writing the code also be up to something?

View OriginalReply0