2026-01-01 22:29:08

Predicted Risks to Watch for in the Cryptocurrency Market in 2026:

First, projects with obvious governance vulnerabilities may face ongoing issues. When weak technical foundations meet insufficient team execution, the long-term prospects of the project will be seriously threatened.

Second, even top protocols ranked in the top 20 by market capitalization are not completely immune. Ecosystem risks, financial pressures, and internal management chaos could all trigger liquidity crises. These risks are often masked during bull markets but tend to surface under market stress.

The third hidden danger comes from black swan events in team governance. When the core members' identities or backgrounds come to light, especially if past controversies or misconduct are exposed, it could deal a heavy blow to the project's reputation. While such events are low probability, their impact often exceeds expectations.

These are not alarmist warnings but are based on recurring patterns observed over years in on-chain ecosystems—decision-making quality of project teams, the true backgrounds of team members, and governance transparency—all ultimately determining who can survive to the next cycle.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NoodlesOrTokens

· 6h ago

Bull markets are so exciting, but everyone is waiting for the black swan to hit. --- Even the top projects can't be saved; the key is whether the team is reliable. --- It's the same old story: governance transparency determines life or death, but unfortunately most projects are pretending to sleep. --- Instead of worrying about risks, it's better to see whose team information is the most solid; that's the real secret to survival. --- People talk nicely, but isn't it just betting on the team's integrity... --- Liquidity crisis? Getting burned on the top 20? It's becoming harder and harder to trust now. --- Black swans are the most frustrating—they have low probability but high damage, unpredictable and unstoppable. --- Those with poor technical foundations still dare to raise funds; they'll be gone sooner or later. --- Bull markets hide everything; bear markets expose everything—it's a cycle of truth. --- When a core member blows the whistle, the entire project's credibility collapses instantly; I've seen too many cases. --- Decision quality, genuine background, governance transparency... in the end, it's about testing character; integrity in the crypto world is the most valuable.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersPaper

· 6h ago

Are you trying to scare us again? You're right, but we all know that the lightning we deserve will come sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

Anon4461

· 6h ago

The bull market covers everything, but when the bear market comes, true skills will be tested. The top 20 projects also experience setbacks; this time, it really depends on which team is reliable.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDetector

· 7h ago

yeah seen this play out too many times... weak governance kills projects faster than any bear market ever could

Reply0

MoonBoi42

· 7h ago

Leading protocols also depend on the people; one scandal can cause an instant crash. --- In other words, it's about information asymmetry. No matter how glamorous the team is, you have to wait for the dirt to come out to know what's true or false. --- Transparency in governance is truly a watershed; only those who don't pretend can survive to the next round. --- The bull market paralysis is real; when the bear market arrives, various risks emerge together. --- When evaluating projects, look at the true background of the decision-makers; there's no shortcut in this regard. --- The word liquidity crisis sounds uncomfortable; if top-tier projects can crash, who do I still believe in? --- Black swan events are low probability but deadly once they hit; I've seen this happen too many times. --- Teams with insufficient execution will eventually fail; no matter how advanced the technology is, it can't save them. --- The on-chain ecosystem has only this much bad; cyclical exposure reveals old problems. --- Top 20 isn't even safe? Then these small coins I hold will make me cry to death.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 7h ago

Honestly, it still depends on the people. No matter how advanced the technology is, without a reliable team, it's all pointless. The top 20 projects can also suffer major setbacks, who can say they are completely risk-free? Black swan events are the hardest to prevent; a sudden revelation can ruin the entire project. History is repeating itself; those who are destined to run will eventually be exposed.

View OriginalReply0