2026-01-01 20:21:41

A recent interesting phenomenon worth pondering: when the purchasing behavior of a key participant evolves from sporadic events to a market norm, how will the entire ecosystem's game rules change?

We have all seen — a leading company demonstrates strong determination in digital asset allocation through continuous actions by its leadership. This is not simply hoarding coins, but a carefully designed financial engineering. From a business perspective, this strategy encompasses multiple dimensions: strengthening the balance sheet with scarce assets, hedging fiat currency devaluation risk, establishing brand differentiation, and seizing strategic high ground. Every large purchase is a concrete reflection of this long-term plan.

Imagine this pattern as an endless one-way channel — continuous inflow with minimal outflow. The difference is that traditional ETFs are operated by fund managers according to rules, whereas here, decision-making power lies in the hands of a leader with strong personal will. This predictability and continuity are quietly changing supply expectations in the Bitcoin market.

When such a "market constant" exists long-term, participants' survival strategies must adapt accordingly. This is not investment advice, but a genuine observation of market structure evolution — understanding this is crucial for every crypto asset participant.

BTC1,78%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainBrokenPromise

· 14h ago

Basically, large investors locking in positions has become the norm, and retail investors are forced to follow suit. The analogy of a one-way channel is perfect—always flowing in, never flowing out, and the entire supply pool is just eaten up like that. The key is that this guy's decisions carry more weight than the entire market’s voice, which is a bit outrageous. Instead of calling it financial engineering, it’s more like directly manipulating expectations. Anyway, retail investors are still retail investors. That’s why people say the rules in the crypto world are unfair—big players’ "long-term plans" are our ceiling.

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 14h ago

This is what it feels like when big players define the market... continuous buying indeed changes the game rules. Once a one-way channel is formed, retail investors have no other way to play—they can only follow the trend or exit. This financial engineering is truly meticulous, hedging fiat currency devaluation while also capturing high points, with every detail maximized. When supply expectations change, the entire market psychology shifts—it's that simple and straightforward. Buy-ins driven by personal will are more terrifying than rule-based ones; they are really a bit unpredictable.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekConfession

· 14h ago

Well... Basically, the big players keep buying, and we follow or not. Wait, isn't there a bit of a logical problem here? Can personal will change market expectations? I'm watching, let's see more. The "fool and money" series is back again. How long this trick can be played depends on policies. No matter how nicely it's said, it's still a gamble—betting he won't change his mind. Honestly, if this continues, how can retail investors play? Ha, never stopping... I don't believe you. This is the financial version of "I have money, I do as I please." Game rules change? Then who benefits from the change? Stable inflow = stable bloodsucking, everyone understands. The key is when he starts selling, that’s the real signal.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 14h ago

Honestly, this is the modern financial slaughter war. Whoever controls the continuous purchasing power holds the pricing power. An endless one-way channel? It sounds like a bottomless pit, and sooner or later, it will reverse. Wait, does this logic hold up... Can individual willpower truly sustain control forever? To put it nicely, it's really just big players forcibly rewriting market expectations. Once supply expectations change, where do we retail investors have a way out? This theory sounds comfortable, but can it really become the market norm? It's a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 14h ago

Basically, big whales set the rules, and retail investors have to follow the dance steps. --- This trading method has been seen through for a long time. Anyone can do one-way accumulation, but the key is how long it can last. --- Always flowing in with zero outflow? Just listen, believing it would be foolish. --- The change in supply expectations is real, but this guy's explanation is too complicated. The core is two words—HODLing. --- Waiting to see how they exit later; this is the real test. --- Financial engineering? Sounds impressive, but it's really just having money to be reckless. --- No matter how sophisticated the strategy, it still depends on the market's mood. Don't take yourself too seriously.

View OriginalReply0