The risk control logic of a certain leading exchange is riddled with flaws. Basically, the platform and users are betting against each other, yet the platform cannot afford to lose. This design is essentially a game of words—claiming to be fair and transparent while using risk control mechanisms to ensure they are always in an invincible position. When users get liquidated and lose money, it's called market risk; if the platform loses money, they immediately cut off the internet connection. This "win without losing" game rule will eventually be exposed. True risk control should protect the common interests of both users and the platform, not shift risks unilaterally.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandlord
· 12h ago
The platform's double standards are truly outrageous. Users' risks are called market fluctuations, while the platform's risks are directly disconnecting the internet cable. This isn't risk control; this is outright theft.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 12h ago
Isn't this just the dealer's logic? When users suffer heavy losses, it's called risk; when the platform has to compensate, they shut down. Haha
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 12h ago
Uh... I've seen this trick so many times before. The platform is just playing a sleight of hand.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 12h ago
I've seen through it long ago; they've been playing this trick for so many years and are still scamming people.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 12h ago
I've seen through this trick a long time ago. Exchanges are the big players, and we're just the retail investors. No matter how nicely you put it, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 13h ago
I should have known. After playing this trick for so long, no one has reported it? That's really funny.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 13h ago
Damn, this tactic is slick. Users lose everything and call it risk, while the platform loses money and immediately runs away. Truly impressive.
The risk control logic of a certain leading exchange is riddled with flaws. Basically, the platform and users are betting against each other, yet the platform cannot afford to lose. This design is essentially a game of words—claiming to be fair and transparent while using risk control mechanisms to ensure they are always in an invincible position. When users get liquidated and lose money, it's called market risk; if the platform loses money, they immediately cut off the internet connection. This "win without losing" game rule will eventually be exposed. True risk control should protect the common interests of both users and the platform, not shift risks unilaterally.