Financial market uncertainties have once again sparked widespread discussion in the crypto community. Faced with market volatility, some rush to liquidate, others buy the dip in the opposite direction, and some choose to wait and see. Behind these different choices are actually varying perceptions of risk and opportunity.

At such moments, the key is not to escape the market but to reassess the asset allocation. From a historical perspective, every market correction presents an opportunity to optimize asset allocation— the question is whether you can seize it.

From a practical standpoint, the logic of actively adjusting positions is straightforward: the first step is to clear out low-quality assets. Small coins and concept tokens lacking fundamental support often see declines of over 80% in extreme market conditions, and may even face liquidity exhaustion. Rather than holding onto these assets and watching the numbers shrink, it’s better to cut losses early and free up capital.

The second step is to reallocate the weights of mainstream coins. For example, adjusting Ethereum’s allocation from 30% to 20%, while increasing Bitcoin’s weight from 40% to 50%. What is the logic behind this adjustment? During market pullbacks, assets that are more closely linked to broader market expectations tend to perform more steadily. Bitcoin, as the most widely recognized store of consensus, has a stronger resilience, while Ethereum faces more volatility in various segmented markets.

The ultimate core idea boils down to six words: eliminate falsehoods, preserve ammunition, and act at the right moment. Remove what shouldn’t be kept, ensure sufficient available funds, and wait for the true entry opportunity. Market declines are essentially a process of wealth redistribution, and the art of allocation lies in positioning oneself correctly.