The $Jager project has been in design since v1 for over four months, during which the token price has fallen to one-fifth of its original value. Some believe that the project team may lack a proper grasp of market rhythm or even make last-minute rule adjustments during game operations. Such practices are bound to raise community concerns.

Interestingly, the community has consistently actively provided feedback. Whether the project team truly absorbs these opinions may depend on their level of understanding. Every fluctuation is met with discussions, indicating that community attention is quite high.

However, there is a perspective worth reflecting on: investors have invested heavily and placed high hopes, which inadvertently puts pressure on the project team. When expectations are too high, any deviation can be amplified. From this angle, does the community itself bear some responsibility for the current situation? This is not about shifting blame but about asking: before criticizing the project team, should we also examine whether our expectations for this project are overly idealized?