Ever wondered if Adam Smith's ideas still hold up today? There's been quite the back-and-forth lately among economics watchers on whether his theories are actually overblown or if they're still the foundation of how we should think about markets and incentives.

The debate gets pretty interesting when you dig into it—some argue his invisible hand concept has been misinterpreted over centuries, while others defend his work as fundamentally sound. It raises questions: how much of classical economic theory should we lean on when markets operate so differently now? With crypto and decentralized systems challenging traditional economic assumptions, this conversation feels oddly timely.

What's your take? Is Smith overrated, or are we just applying his ideas wrong?