2026-01-01 16:23:41

The Federal Reserve injected $105 billion into the market through overnight repurchase operations last night, setting a new record for single-day liquidity infusion since the pandemic. While this move may seem aggressive, it’s important to clarify: this is not quantitative easing, but a signal of liquidity stress within the banking system.

Why are banks collectively "thirsty"? Year-end financial settlements and government bond issuances absorb funds, compounded by market volatility shocks, causing short-term interest rates to spike rapidly. In this environment, banks prefer to park idle funds at the Federal Reserve to earn interest rather than lend to the market—this reflects a microstructural blockage in the financial system.

Compared to risk assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, there are several layers to understand about this operation:

First, it is a defensive move. The core goal of the Federal Reserve is to stabilize interest rates and prevent a collapse of the financial system, providing the entire risk asset market with the expectation that "liquidity will not continue to deteriorate." But this is not an offensive signal.

Second, do not interpret this as the beginning of a large-scale liquidity flood. The real turning point for the crypto market requires the Fed to give clear signals on rate cuts or resuming large-scale asset purchases. Currently, it’s just a "not bad" scenario, still far from "improvement."

Third, monitor the trends of the SOFR rate and changes in the Fed’s balance sheet. If such large liquidity injections become routine, that would be a true sign of a shift toward easing monetary policy.

Historical experience shows that frequent emergency interventions by the Fed often indicate deep structural contradictions. Whether this move can resolve risks or merely delay the storm’s arrival will determine the future trajectory of Bitcoin and mainstream cryptocurrencies.

BTC0,66%

ETH0,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleMistaker

· 4h ago

Defense ≠ Good news, many people have it reversed. The Federal Reserve's rescue is due to systemic issues, not because the market is about to take off. --- In simple terms, it's about plugging leaks; we're still far from easing liquidity. We'll get excited only when a rate cut signal appears. --- 105 billion looks large, but it's just patchwork. The real turning point depends on when the asset purchase plan is launched. --- Frequent rescues = structural risk, that's correct. Those starting to buy the dip now are betting that the Fed can resolve it, but I see it as unlikely. --- SOFR is the key; only then can we see the Fed's true stance. Surface stability hides many holes underneath. --- Don't be fooled by this move; defensive operations mean "don't die first," and we're still a long way from a bull market. --- This year is another year of seeking help; it feels like the problems in the financial system are deepening. --- The phrase "system congestion signal" is interesting; it indeed reflects something.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 4h ago

$105 billion bailout, sounds grand but honestly it's just banks collectively lacking funds, and the Federal Reserve cleaning up the mess. The real big move hasn't come yet, don't be fooled by this round of operations. Let's wait until the rate cut signals appear, for now it's just a matter of not making things worse. Keep a close eye on SOFR; only then can it tell the truth. Let's just wait for the moment when the Federal Reserve truly starts to spend money, right now it's just a life-saving shot.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 4h ago

Is it time to put out the fire again? To put it simply, the system is leaking, and the $105 billion is a band-aid, not a heart stimulant. Not being broken doesn't mean it will rise; everyone is still dreaming of a flood of liquidity... Wake up. SOFR is the key; keeping an eye on this data is much more useful than reading press releases. History shows us what frequent rescue efforts mean; weigh it for yourselves. It's just defensive measures; don't celebrate too early, the real signal hasn't come yet. Banks are unwilling to lend anymore, this signal is frightening enough. Structural contradictions cannot be escaped; delaying the storm = calm before the storm. Interest rate cuts are still far off; let's just pretend we didn't see this wave. Bitcoin has to wait for the Federal Reserve to really "shift" before it can rise; it's not qualified yet.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 4h ago

Wait, 105 billion is the biggest record? It doesn't seem like much. The Fed's most aggressive easing was terrifying. I'm not concerned about hawks or doves; I just want to know when the rate cuts will really start. Currently, this operation is just trying to stop the bleeding. What does the reluctance of banks to lend indicate? Money is actually tight. Don't be fooled by the surface "liquidity." This is the real signal. Large-scale repurchase agreements becoming the norm is a true shift; just looking at this one instance is meaningless. It feels like the Fed is just patching things up again, but the fundamental problem can't be solved... Bitcoin will have to wait.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 4h ago

A one-time injection of 105 billion sounds grand, but honestly, it's just the system screaming for help. Don't be fooled by the surface. The banks collectively pulling back indicates that the water has already reached their eyebrows. This is not a positive signal at all. This round by the Federal Reserve is just stabilizing, preventing things from getting worse. They're still far from truly easing, so don't get too excited. "Liquidity not bad" ≠ "improving." Many people are confused about this. In crypto, we still need to wait for concrete rate cuts. In my opinion, behind frequent firefighting are structural contradictions fermenting. Now it's just a matter of whether the Federal Reserve can truly resolve them or if it's just delaying. Honestly, they stabilized interest rates in the short term, but long-term prospects are uncertain. We still need to keep an eye on SOFR and the balance sheet. Spending 105 billion is more like rescuing someone drowning rather than a positive signal. It's exhausting. This move is just a smoke screen. The real signal depends on whether they will actually cut rates. Otherwise, the crypto prices will just play along with you. Don't be scared by the numbers. The key is whether the Federal Reserve's attitude truly shifts.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 4h ago

105 billion? Sounds impressive, but it's just the Fed "fighting fires." Don't overthink it; Bitcoin hasn't reached the point of drinking soup yet. When the banking sector collectively says they're thirsty, everyone understands it means liquidity is tight. The real easing will have to wait for a rate cut signal. Currently, it's just about stabilizing to prevent a collapse. We're still far from a bull market. This round of operations is essentially defensive, not offensive. SOFR is the real focus; we need to keep a close eye on it. Wait, are they about to deploy another delay tactic? History tends to repeat itself. It's hard to say what the next move will be. Will this truly resolve the issue, or is it just prolonging the life? The answer is very important.

View OriginalReply0