After the investment system gradually matures, I realize that the assessment criteria can actually be greatly simplified—rather than obsessing over specific APY numbers, it's better to benchmark against assets that truly demonstrate performance.
Currently, the core evaluation indicators are:
Assets that must clearly outperform: Nasdaq, S&P 500, CSI 300, Bitcoin. These four are the main reference lines for measuring returns, and surpassing three of them is not enough. Additionally, outperforming the majority of people around me in terms of returns—this better reflects the actual effectiveness of the investment strategy.
Assets that don't need to be chased: gold and silver. These two are more long-term risk hedging tools rather than sources of yield.
Regarding retirement, honestly, I haven't thought about a specific timeline. On one hand, I have little desire for consumption; on the other hand, I am in a long-term flow state, and work itself is a form of fulfillment. Perhaps for me, financial freedom and control over my lifestyle are more important than the numbers themselves. When both are achieved, the question of retiring or not becomes a choice rather than a necessity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 5h ago
Beating four metrics to meet this threshold, honestly, is a bit tough... I feel like I'm further away from this goal again.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 5h ago
ngl the 4-asset benchmark framework hits different... but skipping gold entirely? that's where the oracle breaks down imo
Reply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 5h ago
All four need to be surpassed? This guy is quite strict with himself. But to be fair, just beating the index is already a hurdle for most people, and wanting to crush those around you makes the game rules a bit harsh.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 5h ago
All four need to outperform? Man, your standards are pretty tough. Bitcoin alone is already challenging enough.
After the investment system gradually matures, I realize that the assessment criteria can actually be greatly simplified—rather than obsessing over specific APY numbers, it's better to benchmark against assets that truly demonstrate performance.
Currently, the core evaluation indicators are:
Assets that must clearly outperform: Nasdaq, S&P 500, CSI 300, Bitcoin. These four are the main reference lines for measuring returns, and surpassing three of them is not enough. Additionally, outperforming the majority of people around me in terms of returns—this better reflects the actual effectiveness of the investment strategy.
Assets that don't need to be chased: gold and silver. These two are more long-term risk hedging tools rather than sources of yield.
Regarding retirement, honestly, I haven't thought about a specific timeline. On one hand, I have little desire for consumption; on the other hand, I am in a long-term flow state, and work itself is a form of fulfillment. Perhaps for me, financial freedom and control over my lifestyle are more important than the numbers themselves. When both are achieved, the question of retiring or not becomes a choice rather than a necessity.