"He's at it again." This phrase has become a cliché in the crypto world, a reflection of a love-hate sentiment. Michael Saylor, the former software company leader and now a digital asset evangelist, has once again flooded the community with headlines. Hundreds of thousands of bitcoins, hundreds of billions of dollars in volume—such a scale of buying has long surpassed the definition of ordinary "investment" and has entered a new territory of "asset transformation."
I initially wanted to find historical parallels to understand this. Tulip mania? The South Sea Bubble? The internet crash? After thinking for a while, I realized that these analogies are not quite accurate. Saylor's actions are neither pure gambling nor simple technological faith; they are a systematic approach based on monetary theory and asset management logic.
In my words, Saylor now is more like a sophisticated "Bitcoin converter"—designed clearly, self-driven, continuously channeling traditional capital into digital gold. It’s as if there’s no off button, and no reason to stop.
But here’s an interesting paradox: many people see him as a "madman," yet his calculations are clearer than anyone else's. At first, everyone thought his actions were outrageous—pouring company vaults into highly volatile digital assets? That’s definitely taboo in traditional finance.
But the truth is, maybe what’s truly crazy isn’t this strategy itself. Looking at it now, in the context of persistent inflation and uncertain monetary policies, this kind of Bitcoin allocation actually makes a lot of sense. He’s not gambling; he’s playing a long game.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApeWithNoChain
· 5h ago
Sailor's move, to put it simply, is playing system arbitrage. The rules of traditional finance have become meaningless; he sees through it, while we're still struggling.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 5h ago
The logic of Selina has actually been clear to me for a long time — it's about hedging inflation to the extreme, and while others panic, he's making strategic moves.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 5h ago
This guy Saleh really treats Bitcoin as his life’s work, I’m convinced. The Bitcoin conversion machine is spot on, haha.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAll
· 5h ago
This guy, Saleh, treats Bitcoin as a lifelong career; he really has a feeling of never being able to stop.
"He's at it again." This phrase has become a cliché in the crypto world, a reflection of a love-hate sentiment. Michael Saylor, the former software company leader and now a digital asset evangelist, has once again flooded the community with headlines. Hundreds of thousands of bitcoins, hundreds of billions of dollars in volume—such a scale of buying has long surpassed the definition of ordinary "investment" and has entered a new territory of "asset transformation."
I initially wanted to find historical parallels to understand this. Tulip mania? The South Sea Bubble? The internet crash? After thinking for a while, I realized that these analogies are not quite accurate. Saylor's actions are neither pure gambling nor simple technological faith; they are a systematic approach based on monetary theory and asset management logic.
In my words, Saylor now is more like a sophisticated "Bitcoin converter"—designed clearly, self-driven, continuously channeling traditional capital into digital gold. It’s as if there’s no off button, and no reason to stop.
But here’s an interesting paradox: many people see him as a "madman," yet his calculations are clearer than anyone else's. At first, everyone thought his actions were outrageous—pouring company vaults into highly volatile digital assets? That’s definitely taboo in traditional finance.
But the truth is, maybe what’s truly crazy isn’t this strategy itself. Looking at it now, in the context of persistent inflation and uncertain monetary policies, this kind of Bitcoin allocation actually makes a lot of sense. He’s not gambling; he’s playing a long game.