A critical soundness vulnerability in Succinct could have exposed $4 billion in secured assets—but the team patched it before any damage occurred. Post-disclosure, the ecosystem responded swiftly: Mantle, Arbitrum, and Taiko all ramped up SP1 integration efforts. Now here's the interesting part. Prove is currently valued at $77 million while securing $4 billion across these chains. That's a 51x value-to-security ratio. The math suggests either the protocol is massively underpriced, or we're looking at a different calculation of what actual security value translates to in market terms. Paradigm's take worth pondering.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MevSandwich
· 1h ago
A 51x valuation gap. If Prove isn't truly severely undervalued, then we have completely misunderstood the pricing of security.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 3h ago
51x safety margin difference, this number is a bit crazy. Either Prove is seriously undervalued, or we have completely mispriced the safety value.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 3h ago
A 51x value difference? This number is so outrageous that it's hard to tell whether Prove is undervalued or if we all miscalculated.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 3h ago
A 51x price difference... Either Prove is seriously undervalued, or we all got the math wrong. This math is a bit strange.
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzler
· 4h ago
A 51x valuation gap, is that even possible? Either Prove is severely undervalued, or we have all misunderstood the value of security...
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 4h ago
A 51x valuation difference? How can this number be so outrageous? We need to discuss this thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 4h ago
A 51x value-to-safety ratio, from the perspective of Token economics, violates the principle of incentive compatibility. Either the pricing is wrong, or our calculation model for "safety value" itself is flawed.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrain
· 4h ago
51x price difference... How is this buy and sell calculated? Feels like Prove is either severely undervalued or the market pricing is just outrageous.
A critical soundness vulnerability in Succinct could have exposed $4 billion in secured assets—but the team patched it before any damage occurred. Post-disclosure, the ecosystem responded swiftly: Mantle, Arbitrum, and Taiko all ramped up SP1 integration efforts. Now here's the interesting part. Prove is currently valued at $77 million while securing $4 billion across these chains. That's a 51x value-to-security ratio. The math suggests either the protocol is massively underpriced, or we're looking at a different calculation of what actual security value translates to in market terms. Paradigm's take worth pondering.