Wangcai Coin's token design embodies a typical deflationary model. With a total supply of 1 billion tokens, 92 million have been burned, and the current market circulation plus liquidity pool total less than 70 million — this number warrants further scrutiny.
The most interesting aspect is the implementation of the burn mechanism. Every buy and sell transaction directly sends 3% into the burn pool, which means the circulating supply is continuously decreasing. The more active user trading is, the more frequent the burns, and the greater the supply pressure. From another perspective, over time and with accumulated transactions, the number of tokens available for market circulation will become increasingly scarce.
In theory, as the available circulating supply continues to decrease, and assuming demand remains unchanged, the scarcity will be driven higher. This is the so-called "small bet for big gain" — using limited circulating tokens to carry the entire ecosystem's value expectations. However, whether this logic can truly be realized depends on actual application scenarios and trading activity to support it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ReverseTradingGuru
· 8h ago
The idea of decreasing circulation supply sounds good, but the question is about ecosystem applications. Where are they?
View OriginalReply0
StableNomad
· 8h ago
ngl the 3% burn per trade gives me UST flashbacks... theoretically stable until it's not, you know?
Reply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 8h ago
Oh, this deflationary design sounds good, but I feel like I keep losing more the more I trade...
They really treat traders like cash cows, with destruction mechanisms one after another.
Lower supply does not equal higher prices; without demand, it's worthless.
With such a small circulating supply, it's easy to pump but even easier to dump, brother.
Wait, without real application scenarios, isn't this just an air coin?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 8h ago
Oh no, this deflation logic sounds good, but it seems a bit shaky to me.
Burning is burning, but the key is that someone has to actually use it, otherwise no matter how scarce it becomes, it's useless.
The real issue lies in liquidity. The more you burn, the harder it is to sell, and then you won't even find a sucker to take over.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 8h ago
Burning 92 million sounds like a huge number, but with only 70 million in circulation? It feels like the market is getting smaller and smaller, and this gamble is all about no one leaving later on.
Wangcai Coin's token design embodies a typical deflationary model. With a total supply of 1 billion tokens, 92 million have been burned, and the current market circulation plus liquidity pool total less than 70 million — this number warrants further scrutiny.
The most interesting aspect is the implementation of the burn mechanism. Every buy and sell transaction directly sends 3% into the burn pool, which means the circulating supply is continuously decreasing. The more active user trading is, the more frequent the burns, and the greater the supply pressure. From another perspective, over time and with accumulated transactions, the number of tokens available for market circulation will become increasingly scarce.
In theory, as the available circulating supply continues to decrease, and assuming demand remains unchanged, the scarcity will be driven higher. This is the so-called "small bet for big gain" — using limited circulating tokens to carry the entire ecosystem's value expectations. However, whether this logic can truly be realized depends on actual application scenarios and trading activity to support it.