2026-01-01 12:23:47

Sowellian Fund Experiment just wrapped up—marking the first collective trading initiative of its kind. Eleven traders pooled their expertise to manage the fund over a one-month period, and the results showcase both the potential and risks of decentralized fund stewardship.

The outcomes were starkly contrasting. One trader exited with an impressive 3.5x return, demonstrating what active management and sharp decision-making can achieve in volatile markets. Yet another trader walked away empty-handed, illustrating how market dynamics and strategy alignment can work against certain participants.

Looking at the aggregate performance, the fund itself grew by 7%, signaling positive overall momentum despite the divergent individual results. The wind-down proposal is now live as stakeholders prepare for the experiment's closure—a moment to reflect on what worked, what didn't, and how collective trading mechanisms might evolve in the DeFi ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RunWithRugs

· 11h ago

3.5x is really amazing, but only one person profits, what about the others? --- The one who left empty-handed probably has social anxiety now --- A 7% fund return is nothing special, it doesn't seem that impressive --- Eleven people can achieve this result in a month, DeFi still has a lot to learn --- Where there are winners, there are losers; collective trading is always like this --- Feels a lot like gambling, just with the label of "decentralization" --- Risk definitely needs to be taken seriously; not everyone can handle it

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 11h ago

Is a 3.5x return real? I feel like someone is just bragging... --- 11 traders, and the results are so polarized—this is the true nature of decentralization. --- A 7% fund growth sounds good but not particularly special; it still depends heavily on individual skills. --- Some people get 3.5x, others suffer losses—what's the difference from gambling... --- I want to see the details in this proposal, but it feels like this experiment wasn't as successful as expected. --- Earning 3.5x in a month? I don't believe it, DeFi is too risky. --- Collective fund management still relies on personal ability; the institutional framework is just a facade. --- A 7% increase sounds quite stable, but the guy who lost probably feels pretty bad right now. --- That's why I never believe in "collective trading"; I still prefer to play it safe myself.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 11h ago

3.5x the buddy’s luck is really good, while another buddy suffered a huge loss... This is the reality of collective trading. --- 7% overall return looks pretty good, but I’m just worried that next time no one will dare to join. --- Basically, it’s still about inconsistent strategies. Eleven people, eleven different ideas. Reaching 7% is already pretty good. --- I feel the biggest significance of this experiment is exploring new ways to play; the results are secondary. --- That 3.5x expert must be treated to a meal. Tell me how you did it.

View OriginalReply0