The current situation of the TLM project warrants caution. From a fundamental perspective, this is a project that emerged after the decline of the early P2E concept's popularity. Currently, it lacks new growth narratives and it is difficult to see institutional funds entering to support it. In a retail-dominated market, participants often fall into a dead cycle of mutual betting.



Problems are even more prominent at the contract trading level. First, the market depth is insufficient, leading to abnormal slippage, with ordinary orders being immediately filled at the spread; second, closing positions also becomes a challenge—difficult to execute, which is extremely unfavorable for risk management. The most critical issue is the infinite loss mechanism for counterparties—if someone forcibly pushes the price up by 20%, small-leverage investors can instantly trigger a liquidation.

To put it simply, shorting such tokens is not really about trading, but about gambling against the market gamblers. The chances of winning are limited, and losses can result in total loss of capital. The risk-reward ratio is severely unbalanced.
TLM1%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
FlyingLeekvip
· 01-04 05:06
The lack of depth is really outrageous, slippage is not a trivial matter at all, and retail investors are eaten to death
View OriginalReply0
TokenStormvip
· 01-03 20:27
On-chain data has long shown that the risk score is off the charts, but I couldn't help but backtest it again... Just taking it as paying tuition fees.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotlinevip
· 01-03 19:44
Really, TLM has been a lost cause for a long time. When the P2E concept cooled down, no one stepped up to take over.

Retail investors keep fighting each other, institutions have already fled, and who dares to touch it now?

The contract depth is so shallow that orders are eaten in seconds, and you can't even exit. Isn't this gambling?

A 20% drop and you're liquidated immediately. Bro, this isn't trading; it's just giving money to the market makers.

Forget it, I dare not touch this coin anymore. It's too hot to handle.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddictvip
· 01-03 18:56
Speaking of TLM, we've long been warned. Once the P2E hype fades, there's no hope.

Lack of depth causes slippage to explode. How to trade? Betting against gamblers and losing means total loss.

These kinds of coins shouldn't be leveraged. A 20% drop and you're liquidated instantly. It's not worth it.

With such poor contract depth, who dares to short? Truly brave.

A game where retail investors fleece each other, without institutional entry, will die sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustlervip
· 01-01 12:52
I've long given up understanding this coin, the liquidity is ridiculously poor, making it impossible to operate.

Retail investors are just harvesting each other, institutions have already exited, so what's the point of playing?

Shorting this kind of market is just asking for death, one leverage and it's gone.

TLM is just a casino, might as well admit defeat once you get in.

Slippage is extremely severe, you can't close your position at all, it's too trap-like.

By the way, who is still involved in projects like this? Isn't that suicide?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-01 12:45
Listening to you, TLM indeed feels like a trap, with slippage eating up quickly and unable to close positions... Isn't this just getting liquidated?

Should have known not to touch the P2E model, institutions have already run away, and retail investors are still gambling, isn't this just inviting trouble?

20% liquidation? Oh my, this risk-reward ratio is really outrageous, shorting is just a gamble on luck.

Feels like TLM is a ticking time bomb, with no new narrative and poor liquidity, how can it sustain?

Counterparty infinite loss mechanism? This design itself is suspicious and easily manipulated by large funds.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 01-01 12:39
Really, TLM has been meaningless for a long time, extremely garbage, with huge slippage

Retail investors trap each other, institutions have already exited, there's no story to tell

Shorting this thing is purely gambling, not worth it
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHuntervip
· 01-01 12:36
Contract depth is weak, slippage is extremely severe, who dares to play this?

---

The P2E model is outdated, most of those still hyping TLM are trapped.

---

Honestly, retail investors are just cutting each other's leeks; institutions have long since run away.

---

A 20% surge and a sudden explosion—this isn't trading, it's gambling.

---

It's even hard to close a position now; liquidity is completely garbage.

---

Shorting this kind of coin is just asking for death; there's really no chance of winning.

---

Institutional funds have moved elsewhere, leaving only gamblers behind.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidatorvip
· 01-01 12:32
Retail investor meat grinder, I've seen too many of these. The P2E wave is already dead.

Stay away from contracts with deep disparities; once slippage appears, you know you're going to get liquidated.

Short TLM? Think again, it's just gambling.

A 20% drop and you're liquidated—who dares to touch it?

Institutions have already left, leaving only mutual harm.

I'd rather stay out of such coins than participate.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin