Start the first day of the new year by giving yourself a boost. Wishing everyone a bountiful harvest in 2026!
Recently, I looked at the rankings of popular projects and unexpectedly found myself on the 7-day and 30-day charts of MemeMax. But to be honest, these rankings are like temporary report cards; they shouldn't be taken too seriously. Fluctuations in rankings actually reflect a positive sign—the more intense the competition, the larger the project's ecosystem, and the higher the engagement.
Rather than obsessing over ranking fluctuations, I am more concerned about whether the sincerity behind the project is genuine. As I mentioned in previous analyses, MemeMax's efforts in ecosystem development are worth paying attention to. Whether market enthusiasm and real investment can complement each other is the long-term aspect worth observing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastingMaximalist
· 3h ago
Rankings are often more about hype than substance; what's truly interesting is who is actually investing real money into ecosystem development.
Oops, wait, are you subtly promoting MemeMax? Haha, but I appreciate the honesty.
Don't even think about rankings in 2026; it's good enough if the industry makes it to the end of the year.
Ecosystem development is indeed the key, but honestly, most projects are just talking big.
So what if your ranking is high? Without real financial backing, a project can still blow up; you should understand that.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 3h ago
Oh, rankings are just superficial. Honestly, it all comes down to whether real money is pouring into the ecosystem. I'm currently holding full positions in MemeMax, betting on this very point.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 3h ago
Rankings are just a bunch of hot air; popularity comes quickly and goes just as fast. It still depends on how much real effort the project team has put in.
In terms of ecosystem development, MemeMax is indeed working seriously, unlike some projects that only hype concepts. That's what’s worth following.
The New Year is just for fun anyway. After all, in the crypto world, a day is like ten years. No need to fuss over these ranking changes.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 3h ago
Rankings are like unverified contracts; they look good on paper but are actually all empty. What truly matters is whether the ecosystem development has solid backing—this is the key to avoiding re-entrancy attacks.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 3h ago
Rankings are really just a vanity toy; fluctuations are quite normal.
Ecosystem development is the real key indicator, and MemeMax indeed has something in this regard.
Start the first day of the new year by giving yourself a boost. Wishing everyone a bountiful harvest in 2026!
Recently, I looked at the rankings of popular projects and unexpectedly found myself on the 7-day and 30-day charts of MemeMax. But to be honest, these rankings are like temporary report cards; they shouldn't be taken too seriously. Fluctuations in rankings actually reflect a positive sign—the more intense the competition, the larger the project's ecosystem, and the higher the engagement.
Rather than obsessing over ranking fluctuations, I am more concerned about whether the sincerity behind the project is genuine. As I mentioned in previous analyses, MemeMax's efforts in ecosystem development are worth paying attention to. Whether market enthusiasm and real investment can complement each other is the long-term aspect worth observing.