2026-01-01 12:15:30

Is it really worth holding onto an asset that's gone nowhere? 2026 might be the year to face reality—if your crypto position has been flatlined for months with no clear catalysts or momentum, it could signal deeper issues worth examining. Sometimes the smartest move isn't averaging down or hoping for a comeback; it's recognizing when a project has lost its narrative or execution edge. Not every holding deserves a forever seat in your portfolio. What's your take—would you cut losses on stagnant positions or wait longer?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleStalker

· 4h ago

Honestly, holding onto a bad project is really pointless... Instead of praying for a rebound every day, it's better to face reality and cut losses, anyway, there are plenty of opportunities in the crypto world.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 4h ago

Why keep coins that don't have a story?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 4h ago

It's never too late to cut losses, the problem is that most people simply can't do it...

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 4h ago

Well, my logic is like this: RSI has already fallen into the death cross zone. Assets without fuel replenishment are basically in orbital decay. Initiating a stop-loss early is much more meaningful than stubbornly holding on.

View OriginalReply0