2026-01-01 10:12:21

$LGHT high-control tokens like this are really ruthless. With a fee rate below -1, short sellers get squeezed into minced meat as soon as they enter, and there's no way to escape.

But I've always wondered, why do some tokens set the fee to be charged every 1 hour, while others do it every 4 hours? How is this difference determined? Each token has different rules, and it seems there is no clear standard to follow.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeAuditQueen

· 4h ago

There is indeed no standardized regulation for the fee cycle. To put it simply, it depends on how the developer sets it when writing the contract. But you asked the right question — this is exactly a red flag for audits. Some projects intentionally extend the cycle to hide the true fee impact, while others do so to optimize gas costs for frequent harvesting. It's worth checking the source code.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 5h ago

The issue of fee cycle is really hard to clarify; it feels like the project team sets it arbitrarily. --- Negative fees are so exaggerated that short sellers would be completely drained if they enter. --- The difference between 1-hour and 4-hour is so big. Who is actually responsible for regulation? --- High control coins are just a scam; once you get in, don't expect to get out unscathed. --- These rules and standards are too vague; it feels like Schrödinger's fairness. --- The more frequently the fees are collected, the harsher they are. The project team really knows how to play. --- Each coin has its own set of rules. Who the hell can figure them all out?

View OriginalReply0

MoonWaterDroplets