The zero-knowledge computation layer is indeed an interesting direction. Currently, as blockchain moves toward mainstream adoption, computational efficiency and data retrieval are always the bottleneck issues that cannot be bypassed. Many projects rely on oracles, cross-chain bridges, or on-chain indexers to remedy this, but the problem is that these solutions often introduce third-party intermediaries—once trust issues arise, the essence of decentralization can easily be compromised.



On the other hand, zero-knowledge proof technology can verify the correctness of computations while maintaining transparency and autonomy in on-chain interactions. This has great potential for building a purer decentralized ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropJunkievip
· 1h ago
ZK is indeed unavoidable, but to be honest, it's still in the PPT stage, and the number of projects that are truly usable is limited.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatchervip
· 1h ago
Zero-knowledge indeed needs to be carefully studied. Currently, many projects rely on middlemen to profit from the spread. Once trust collapses, the entire system becomes useless.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperervip
· 1h ago
Zero-knowledge is indeed the breakthrough, but those oracle solutions are really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 2h ago
I'm already tired of all that oracle stuff; now it's all about these intermediaries making a profit from the spread.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)