Want to see how AI models perform in real trading? Someone conducted an interesting experiment—three mainstream AIs went head-to-head.
Conditions were exactly the same: each given $100k, in the same market, at the same time. The result? Grok achieved a 4.20% increase, outperforming Gemini and ChatGPT.
This comparison data is quite meaningful. It’s not just parameter tuning in a lab, but real trading data with real money. It shows that in actual decision-making and risk management, different models still have significant differences. Someone tracked the progress of this test, and the data is indeed available.
Market attention to AI trading tools is increasing, and such straightforward performance comparisons can serve as useful references for many.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaisyUnicorn
· 47m ago
Well, Grok really proved me wrong this time. I thought they were all similar...
Oh wait, is this a real 100k in actual cash testing? Now that's convincing data, much more reliable than those laboratory parameters.
To be honest, I’ve fallen into traps before, letting AI help me make decisions that almost led to liquidation. Now I see I need to choose the right model.
Should ChatGPT update its decision-making logic this time? Haha.
4.20% may not seem like much, but this is the difference achieved through risk control. Feels like flowers are about to bloom.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 3h ago
Grok really outdid itself this time, crushing the other two with 4.2%
Wait, is this real? Feels like propaganda
Hmm, why is ChatGPT still so weak
100k just for this little return? I thought it could double
Grok does have some real skills, next time I’ll try trading with it
But speaking of which, 100k principal is too small, is the data sample sufficient?
This is the truth of AI trading, looks like I need to switch tools
Single experiment credibility is average, need to run multiple comparisons
Grok dominates the scene, if it were me, I’d switch to it immediately
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 3h ago
Damn, Grok is really awesome? Outperforming ChatGPT by a long shot...
Now we have to see if Grok can stay steady afterward, don't want it to end after just one wave.
Wait, is this a real trade or a demo account? Need to clarify.
100k yields 4.2%, sounds pretty good, but why does it feel not that exaggerated?
I just want to know what those two AI that lost did...
Grok is making a splash this time, I need to keep an eye on the follow-up.
But speaking of which, AI trading cryptocurrencies dares to use real money? If it were me, I would have been 🔪 long ago.
If this data is real, then it's outrageous. Is Grok really that powerful?
Just looking at one test isn't enough; need to run multiple times to check for reproducibility.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrownies
· 3h ago
grok really held it together this time, the other two underperformed
Wait, only 4 points? I thought it could turn the market around
Honestly, 100k in principal testing has limited significance
Can AI trading make money? Why am I still losing haha
The data looks good, but can this thing be replayed?
Real money is convincing, but who can guarantee risk control
grok has some potential, next time try using it
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrain
· 4h ago
Grok really proved itself this time, directly surpassing the other two by 4.2%
Wait, this is only 100k, I wonder what it would look like when scaled to real trading volume
ChatGPT still relies on its brand to survive
Need to observe a few more trades before drawing a conclusion; one successful trade might just be luck
Grok's risk control definitely has some substance, I admit that
But this comparison feels a bit unfair; market conditions can change
Has anyone actually tested with real money? Just looking at the data always feels a bit lacking
That's why I still trust human judgment more
Suddenly remembered, AI trading is actually a game of probabilities
But Grok has indeed shown some backbone this time, worth paying attention to
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 4h ago
Grok wins again? Now ChatGPT needs to reflect and reconsider
---
Data from running 100k real money is much more reliable than armchair speculation
---
Wait, just one experiment's data to draw a conclusion? Can it be repeated?
---
Poor risk control? Then I need to consider who to use
---
Real trading data > laboratory parameters, no doubt about that
---
Grok 4.20% sounds impressive, but is it stable afterward?
---
All three models only earning this much? The market is really tough
---
Having tracking data is good, but I'm worried it might be selective reporting
---
This thing can be referenced, but don’t go all in
---
Honestly, has the era of AI-driven trading really arrived?
Want to see how AI models perform in real trading? Someone conducted an interesting experiment—three mainstream AIs went head-to-head.
Conditions were exactly the same: each given $100k, in the same market, at the same time. The result? Grok achieved a 4.20% increase, outperforming Gemini and ChatGPT.
This comparison data is quite meaningful. It’s not just parameter tuning in a lab, but real trading data with real money. It shows that in actual decision-making and risk management, different models still have significant differences. Someone tracked the progress of this test, and the data is indeed available.
Market attention to AI trading tools is increasing, and such straightforward performance comparisons can serve as useful references for many.