The Trump administration just ordered a Colorado power plant to keep its coal-fired unit operational past Wednesday's scheduled shutdown. It's the second directive forcing similar facilities to stay online instead of retiring.



Why this matters? Energy policy moves like these directly impact electricity costs. For miners and data centers running 24/7, power expense is everything. When coal stays online longer, it can influence regional energy pricing and grid dynamics. Worth watching if you're tracking operational costs in the sector or analyzing how macro energy policy ripples through markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 2h ago
Coal power being forcibly retained... for mining costs, it's hard to say whether it's good or bad.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKingvip
· 2h ago
Coal power plants not retiring, miners are all smiles... Wait, is this a covert way of raising electricity prices? In the long run, it might not be really cost-effective.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptainvip
· 2h ago
Is it actually a positive that coal and electricity are not shutting down? I'll first short it in the opposite direction and see. Once this policy is implemented, the next time it will definitely be halved.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)